HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Combination of sotalol and quinidine in a canine model of torsades de pointes: no increase in the QT-related proarrhythmic action of sotalol.

AbstractINTRODUCTION:
Clinical treatment with a combination of Class IA and III antiarrhythmic drugs is not recommended, as they both favor bradycardia-dependent proarrhythmic events such as torsades de pointes (TdP). However, this theoretical additive effect on ventricular repolarization has never been demonstrated and could be questioned as other Class I drugs, such as mexiletine, a Class IB drug, limit the number of sotalol-induced TdP in dogs with AV block, suggesting the possibility of an antagonistic action of Class I properties against Class III effects.
METHODS AND RESULTS:
We compared the electrophysiologic and proarrhythmic effects of sotalol (Class III) alone and combined with quinidine (Class IA) in a canine model of acquired long QT syndrome. Seven hypokalemic (K+: 3 +/- 0.1 mEq/L) dogs with chronic AV block had a demand pacemaker implanted and set at a rate of 25 beats/min. They were submitted to two (sotalol-alone and sotalol-plus-quinidine) experiments 48 hours apart using a randomized cross-over protocol. They were pretreated with quinidine (10 mg/kg + 1.8 mg/kg per hour) or saline infused throughout the experiment, and given sotalol (4.5 mg/kg + 1.5 mg/kg per hour) for 2 hours, 30 minutes after the beginning of the pretreatment infusion during both experiments. Ventricular and atrial cycle lengths were similarly increased by sotalol after quinidine or saline. The sotalol-induced prolongation of the QT interval was significantly shorter in quinidine-pretreated dogs (24 +/- 7 msec after quinidine vs 40 +/- 8 msec after saline). Fewer dogs developed TdP: significantly during the first hour of infusion (1/7 sotalol-plus-quinidine vs 6/7 sotalol-alone dogs, P < 0.05) but nonsignificantly during the second hour (3/7 vs 6/7).
CONCLUSION:
In this model, the sotalol-plus-quinidine combination is at least no more arrhythmogenic than either of the drugs given alone.
AuthorsF Chézalviel-Guilbert, V Deplanne, J M Davy, J M Poirier, Y Z Xia, G Cheymol, J Weissenburger
JournalJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol) Vol. 9 Issue 5 Pg. 498-507 (May 1998) ISSN: 1045-3873 [Print] United States
PMID9607458 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
  • Sodium Chloride
  • Sotalol
  • Quinidine
Topics
  • Animals
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents (adverse effects, pharmacology)
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac (chemically induced, physiopathology)
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Dogs
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Electrophysiology
  • Infusions, Intravenous
  • Quinidine (adverse effects, pharmacology)
  • Sodium Chloride (pharmacology)
  • Sotalol (adverse effects, pharmacology)
  • Torsades de Pointes (drug therapy, physiopathology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: