HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Brompheniramine, loratadine, and placebo in allergic rhinitis: a placebo-controlled comparative clinical trial.

Abstract
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of an extended-release formulation of a classical antihistamine, brompheniramine, and a second-generation compound, loratadine, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Subjects with symptoms of allergic rhinitis received brompheniramine 12 mg twice daily (n = 112), loratadine 10 mg once daily (n = 112), or placebo twice daily (n = 114) for 7 days. Study medications were blinded using a double-dummy technique. Subjects completed an overall evaluation of symptom relief on a daily basis and returned on treatment days 3 and 7, at which times the investigator assessed symptom severity. The investigator and subject each completed a global efficacy evaluation, and subjects were interviewed regarding adverse experiences. The primary efficacy variable was the physicians' global efficacy evaluation on day 3. Symptoms also were analyzed as summed severity scores for all symptoms and for the nasal symptom cluster of rhinorrhea, sneezing, and nasal blockage. At all post-baseline evaluations (days 3, 7, and averaged over the two days), brompheniramine was significantly better than loratadine and placebo for both sets of summed symptom scores and all three global assessments. Loratadine was significantly better than placebo for physician ratings of total symptom severity averaged over the two days and for the physician and subject ratings of the nasal cluster on day 3. Central nervous system-related symptoms were the most frequently reported adverse experiences; somnolence was reported most frequently by patients taking brompheniramine, and its occurrence was less frequent as treatment continued. A nonprescription, extended-release formulation of brompheniramine 12 mg twice daily provided significantly better relief of symptomatic allergic rhinitis than loratadine 10 mg once daily.
AuthorsH M Druce, W R Thoden, P Mure, S A Furey, E A Lockhart, T Xie, S Galant, B M Prenner, S Weinstein, R Ziering, M L Brandon
JournalJournal of clinical pharmacology (J Clin Pharmacol) Vol. 38 Issue 4 Pg. 382-9 (Apr 1998) ISSN: 0091-2700 [Print] England
PMID9590467 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Allergic Agents
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists
  • Placebos
  • Loratadine
  • Brompheniramine
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anti-Allergic Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Brompheniramine (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Child
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Histamine H1 Antagonists (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Loratadine (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Placebos
  • Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial (drug therapy, pathology)
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: