HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Randomized comparison of Guglielmi detachable coils and cellulose acetate polymer for treatment of aneurysms in dogs.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Endovascular treatments for aneurysms are being used more frequently in patients in the absence of a large body of information on their histopathological effects. This study determined the efficacy and histopathological effects of treatment of experimental aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC) or cellulose acetate polymer (CAP).
METHODS:
Fourteen dogs had 13 terminal and 30 sidewall aneurysms created with venous pouches sutured to the cervical carotid arteries. Two weeks later, dogs had angiography followed by randomization to no treatment (n=2) or to aneurysm occlusion with GDC (n=4) or CAP (n=6). Two months later, angiography was repeated, animals were killed, and aneurysms were excised, fixed, photographed, and examined by light and electron microscopy.
RESULTS:
Two dogs were excluded because of common carotid artery occlusion at 2-week angiography. There were 11 terminal and 16 sidewall aneurysms available for treatment. The rate of spontaneous thrombosis of untreated aneurysms was 0% (0/5). Treatment with GDC showed complete terminal and sidewall aneurysm obliteration rates of 33% (1/3) and 80% (4/5), respectively. Greater than 90% occlusion occurred in the remaining cases. There were no parent or branch artery occlusions. Treatment with CAP showed complete terminal and sidewall aneurysm obliteration rates of 20% (1/5) and 0% (0/5), respectively, and incomplete sidewall aneurysm obliteration in 1 of 5 cases. Aneurysms reformed at 2 months in 2 of 5 terminal and 1 of 5 sidewall cases. There were parent or branch artery occlusions with CAP in 2 and 4 cases, respectively. The rate of aneurysm occlusion was significantly lower and the rate of arterial occlusion significantly higher with CAP than with GDC (P<.05). Histopathology showed complete endothelialization across the orifice of the aneurysm successfully treated with CAP, whereas aneurysms treated with GDC were significantly more likely to show fresh or organizing thrombus without complete endothelialization (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
It is concluded that both treatments have limitations. Complete packing of aneurysms with GDC obliterates the aneurysm, but endothelialization does not always occur within 2 months. There are substantial problems with CAP. It is thrombogenic and carries a higher risk of causing arterial thrombosis. Even if an aneurysm is successfully obliterated initially with CAP, the CAP may disappear, leaving the aneurysm completely untreated.
AuthorsR L Macdonald, S Mojtahedi, L Johns, A Kowalczuk
JournalStroke (Stroke) Vol. 29 Issue 2 Pg. 478-85; discussion 485-6 (Feb 1998) ISSN: 0039-2499 [Print] United States
PMID9472893 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.)
Chemical References
  • Biocompatible Materials
  • acetylcellulose
  • Cellulose
Topics
  • Animals
  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Cellulose (analogs & derivatives)
  • Cerebral Angiography
  • Cerebral Arteries (diagnostic imaging, pathology)
  • Dogs
  • Embolization, Therapeutic (instrumentation, methods)
  • Intracranial Aneurysm (diagnostic imaging, pathology, therapy)
  • Intracranial Embolism and Thrombosis (diagnostic imaging, pathology, therapy)
  • Random Allocation

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: