HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and safety of fexofenadine hydrochloride for treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
H1-receptor antagonists are effective for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. In rare circumstances, some second-generation H1-receptor antagonists have been associated with prolongation of the corrected QT interval (QTc), thus increasing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. Fexofendine HCl, the carboxylic acid metabolite of terfenadine, is a new second-generation antihistamine that is nonsedating and does not cause electrocardiographic effects.
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of fexofenadine HCl in the treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis and to characterize the dose-response relationship of fexofenadine HCl at dosages of 60, 120, and 240 mg bid.
METHODS:
A multicenter, 14-day, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was conducted with patients suffering from moderate to severe ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis who met symptom severity criteria after a 3-day placebo baseline period. Patients with minimal or very severe symptoms during the baseline period were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive fexofenadine HCl (60, 120, or 240 mg bid) or placebo at 12-hour dosing intervals (7:00 AM and 7:00 PM). The primary efficacy measure was patient-assessed 12-hour reflective total symptom score before the evening dose (trough).
RESULTS:
Five hundred seventy patients completed the trial. Fexofenadine HCl at each dosage provided significant improvement in total symptom score (P < or = .003) and in all individual nasal symptoms compared with placebo. The frequency of adverse events was similar among fexofenadine HCl and placebo groups, with no dose-related trends. No sedative effects or electrocardiographic abnormalities, including prolongations in QTc were detected.
CONCLUSIONS:
Fexofenadine HCl is both effective and safe for the treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis. Because there was no additional efficacy at higher dosages, 60 mg bid appears to be the optimal therapeutic dosage for these patients.
AuthorsD I Bernstein, W F Schoenwetter, R A Nathan, W Storms, R Ahlbrandt, J Mason
JournalAnnals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology (Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol) Vol. 79 Issue 5 Pg. 443-8 (Nov 1997) ISSN: 1081-1206 [Print] United States
PMID9396979 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Histamine Antagonists
  • Placebos
  • Terfenadine
  • fexofenadine
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Child
  • Drug Evaluation
  • Female
  • Histamine Antagonists (therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Placebos
  • Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal (drug therapy)
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Terfenadine (adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, standards, therapeutic use)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: