Abstract |
Research information is often recommended as a solution for occupational disease and injury. This study asks whether publicly available research information on prevention of a well-documented occupational hazard is acted on by an important sector in industry. The hazard, allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by epoxy resins in paints, is particularly significant for painters, who may have to leave their jobs as a consequence of the condition. No evidence is found, according to a priori criteria, that paint manufacturers/suppliers acted on known prevention measures for epoxy resin ACD that are within their control to implement. The findings suggest that availability of research information alone fails to solve health and safety problems. Recommendations for avenues of direct and indirect enforcement where voluntary implementation is absent in the painting industry are suggested.
|
Authors | N Holmes, P Pearce, G Simpson |
Journal | American journal of industrial medicine
(Am J Ind Med)
Vol. 24
Issue 5
Pg. 605-17
(Nov 1993)
ISSN: 0271-3586 [Print] United States |
PMID | 8266935
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Australia
- Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
(etiology, prevention & control)
- Dermatitis, Occupational
(etiology, prevention & control)
- Epoxy Resins
(adverse effects, chemistry, standards)
- Gloves, Protective
(standards)
- Humans
- Industry
(standards)
- Occupational Exposure
(prevention & control, standards)
- Occupational Health
(legislation & jurisprudence)
- Paint
(adverse effects, analysis, standards)
- Research
- Safety
|