HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A prospective randomized comparison of autodecremental pacing to burst pacing in device therapy for chronic ventricular tachycardia secondary to coronary artery disease.

Abstract
A number of modes of antitachycardia pacing therapies are available in the newer generations of implantable cardioverter/defibrillators. The efficacy of synchronized burst overdrive pacing for the termination of induced and spontaneous monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was compared with synchronized autodecremental (ramp) pacing in 21 patients who received an implantable antitachycardia pacemaker/cardioverter/defibrillator for treatment of recurrent sustained monomorphic VT. Patients undergoing serial noninvasive VT induction studies after device implantation were prospectively randomized to receive trials of burst or ramp pacing therapies in a crossover study design. Antitachycardia pacing therapies were equally efficacious in treating induced VT (68% for ramp, 76% for burst pacing trials). The efficacy of ramp (93%) and burst (96%) pacing therapies was significantly higher in terminating spontaneously occurring episodes of VT than in terminating induced episodes (p = 0.001). The incidence of tachycardia acceleration was similar for both modes of pacing. The incidence of VT acceleration was lower for spontaneously occurring episodes of VT (0.01%) than for induced episodes of VT (6%, p < 0.01). Thus, antitachycardia pacing is an effective therapy for episodes of monomorphic VT, and the risk of accelerating VT to a hemodynamically unstable form is low. Antitachycardia pacing therapies are more effective against spontaneously occurring episodes than induced episodes of VT. Differences in tachycardia cycle length and duration may contribute to these effects.
AuthorsA M Gillis, J W Leitch, R S Sheldon, C A Morillo, D G Wyse, R Yee, G J Klein, L B Mitchell
JournalThe American journal of cardiology (Am J Cardiol) Vol. 72 Issue 15 Pg. 1146-51 (Nov 15 1993) ISSN: 0002-9149 [Print] United States
PMID8237804 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial (methods)
  • Chronic Disease
  • Coronary Disease (complications)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tachycardia, Ventricular (etiology, therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: