HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Trimethoprim--sulphamethoxazole: comparative study in urinary infection in hospital.

Abstract
Trimethoprim is inhibitory for a wide range of bacteria, and when used in combination with a sulphonamide marked synergy has been reported.In order to test its value in the treatment of urinary infections 154 hospital patients with infections of varying severity and due to a wide range of organisms were treated with combinations of sulphamethoxazole and trimethoprim. Combinations of these substances in two different ratios (2:1 and 10:1) were used in 113 patients, and one week after the end of treatment about three-quarters were cured by both combinations. In a second study 106 patients were treated with a sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim combination (5:1), ampicillin, or sulphadimidine. The cure rate with the 5:1 combination was higher than that found with ampicillin or sulphadimidine both one week after finishing treatment (sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim 85%, ampicillin 70%, sulphadimidine 40%) and at the fourth- to fifth-week follow-up (sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim 67%, ampicillin 52%, sulphadimidine 15%).The results obtained with the various sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim combinations did not indicate that a particular ratio was superior for treating urinary infections in general or for those caused by any particular species of organism.Laboratory studies showed that many bacteria causing urinary infections in hospital were sensitive to trimethoprim, and the therapeutic results could have been largely predicted from a knowledge of the in-vitro sensitivity tests to trimethoprim alone. For example, sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim in the treatment of Proteus mirabilis infections was less successful than in those due to Escherichia coli, and this finding was clearly reflected in the higher minimal inhibitory concentrations for trimethoprim of Pr. mirabilis.The sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim combination was simple to administer, free from side-effects, and gave satisfactory results in the treatment of urinary infections that occurred in hospital patients.
AuthorsD S Reeves, M C Faiers, R E Pursell, W Brumfitt
JournalBritish medical journal (Br Med J) Vol. 1 Issue 5643 Pg. 541-4 (Mar 01 1969) ISSN: 0007-1447 [Print] England
PMID4885025 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Folic Acid Antagonists
  • Pyrimidines
  • Sulfonamides
  • Ampicillin
  • Sulfamethoxazole
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Ampicillin (therapeutic use)
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Drug Synergism
  • Escherichia coli (drug effects)
  • Female
  • Folic Acid Antagonists (therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Penicillin Resistance
  • Proteus (drug effects)
  • Pyrimidines (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Sulfamethoxazole (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Sulfonamides (therapeutic use)
  • Urinary Tract Infections (drug therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: