HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Meobentine sulfate: antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic effects assessed by programmed electrical stimulation and ambulatory monitoring in patients with complex ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Report of a multicenter evaluation.

Abstract
Five cardiology centers conducted open-label prospective trials of meobentine sulfate, an intravenously and orally available analog of bethanidine, to assess its potential for treatment of recurrent, drug refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF), and complex ventricular arrhythmias. The study population comprised 26 patients (mean age, 61 years); 18 were men. Coronary artery disease was present in 15, cardiomyopathy in six, and valvular heart disease in three. Patients presented with both VT and VF (seven), sustained VT alone (12), or frequent ventricular ectopy (PVCs) and nonsustained VT (seven). Of the 26 patients, 5 were enrolled in antiarrhythmic studies (chronic PVC suppression) and 21 were enrolled in programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies. Two of five in the chronic PVC study showed greater than 75% arrhythmia suppression. Among 21 patients in PES studies, there were eight intravenous (16 mg/kg) and 19 oral trials (400 to 1000 mg every 6 hours, 3 days/dose interval). Five of 22 patients showed efficacy at repeat PES study (neither VT nor VF), one showed partial efficacy, and four were not restudied because of clinical arrhythmia (three) and/or adverse effects (two). Overall, three patients (12%) were continued on the drug for an extended period of time. Adverse experience included hypotension in 50% and gastrointestinal effects (nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea) in 56% (oral trials only). Adverse reactions led to drug discontinuation in six and dosage reduction in eight patients. Thus, meobentine may prevent induction of VT or VF or reduce frequency of complex PVCs in selected patients refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents, but the response rate is relatively low. Symptomatic hypotension or gastrointestinal adverse effects are common and may limit utility of meobentine as a chronic oral antiarrhythmic agent.
AuthorsJ L Anderson, P R Reid, E V Platia, M Akhtar, J N Ruskin, S F Schaal, P Jueng, R A Long, T L Wenger
JournalAmerican heart journal (Am Heart J) Vol. 110 Issue 4 Pg. 774-84 (Oct 1985) ISSN: 0002-8703 [Print] United States
PMID3901715 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
  • Guanidines
  • Methylguanidine
  • meobentine
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Ambulatory Care
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Electric Stimulation
  • Electrophysiology
  • Female
  • Guanidines (administration & dosage)
  • Humans
  • Infusions, Parenteral
  • Male
  • Methylguanidine (administration & dosage, adverse effects, analogs & derivatives)
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic
  • Prospective Studies
  • Tachycardia (drug therapy, physiopathology)
  • Ventricular Fibrillation (drug therapy, physiopathology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: