Abstract |
Three clasping systems were placed in five patients, and measurements of abutment tooth mobility were made. These data were compared to previously established baselines and statistically analyzed. The findings of the study are: 1. There was no difference in abutment tooth mobility during the 4-week test period with each of the three clasping systems. The important factor may have been the fit of the distal-extension denture base over the residual ridge, which provides the stability to prevent increases in abutment mobility. 2. Any mobility increases were in a buccal direction only, or toward the flexible retentive clasp arm. There was never any change in lingual mobility. 3. All five patients chose the I-bar retainer as the design of choice due to its increased resistance to dislodgment. Periodic recall of distal-extension removable partial denture patients is mandatory to ensure proper stress distribution and prevent increases in abutment tooth mobility.
|
Authors | O C Tebrock, R M Rohen, R K Fenster, G B Pelleu Jr |
Journal | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
(J Prosthet Dent)
Vol. 41
Issue 5
Pg. 511-6
(May 1979)
ISSN: 0022-3913 [Print] United States |
PMID | 374712
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Dental Abutments
- Dental Stress Analysis
- Denture Design
(adverse effects)
- Denture Precision Attachment
- Denture Retention
- Denture, Partial, Removable
(adverse effects)
- Evaluation Studies as Topic
- Humans
- Mandibular Diseases
(therapy)
- Mouth, Edentulous
(therapy)
- Tooth Mobility
(etiology, pathology)
|