HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Intravenous pegylated asparaginase versus intramuscular native Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (DFCI 05-001): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
l-asparaginase is a universal component of treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, and is usually administered intramuscularly. Pegylated Escherichia coli asparaginase (PEG-asparaginase) has a longer half-life and is potentially less immunogenic than the native Escherichia coli (E coli) preparation, and can be more feasibly administered intravenously. The aim of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Consortium Protocol 05-001 (DFCI 05-001) was to compare the relative toxicity and efficacy of intravenous PEG-asparaginase and intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
METHODS:
DFCI 05-001 enrolled patients aged 1-18 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia from 11 consortium sites in the USA and Canada. Patients were assigned to an initial risk group on the basis of their baseline characteristics and then underwent 32 days of induction therapy. Those who achieved complete remission after induction therapy were assigned to a final risk group and were eligible to participate in a randomised comparison of intravenous PEG-asparaginase (15 doses of 2500 IU/m(2) every 2 weeks) or intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase (30 doses of 25 000 IU/m(2) weekly), beginning at week 7 after study entry. Randomisation (1:1) was unmasked, and was done by a statistician-generated allocation sequence using a permuted blocks algorithm (block size of 4), stratified by final risk group. The primary endpoint of the randomised comparison was the overall frequency of asparaginase-related toxicities (defined as allergy, pancreatitis, and thrombotic or bleeding complications). Predefined secondary endpoints were disease-free survival, serum asparaginase activity, and quality of life during therapy as assessed by PedsQL surveys. All analyses were done by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00400946.
FINDINGS:
Between April 22, 2005, and Feb 12, 2010, 551 eligible patients were enrolled. 526 patients achieved complete remission after induction, of whom 463 were randomly assigned to receive intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase (n=231) or intravenous PEG-asparaginase (n=232). The two treatment groups did not differ significantly in the overall frequency of asparaginase-related toxicities (65 [28%] of 232 patients in the intravenous PEG-asparaginase group vs 59 [26%] of 231 patients in the intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase group, p=0·60), or in the individual frequency of allergy (p=0·36), pancreatitis (p=0·55), or thrombotic or bleeding complications (p=0·26). Median follow-up was 6·0 years (IQR 5·0-7·1). 5-year disease-free survival was 90% (95% CI 86-94) for patients assigned to intravenous PEG-asparaginase and 89% (85-93) for those assigned to intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase (p=0·58). The median nadir serum asparaginase activity was significantly higher in patients who received intravenous PEG-asparaginase than in those who received intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase. Significantly more anxiety was reported by both patients and parent-proxy in the intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase group than in the intravenous PEG-asparaginase group. Scores for other domains were similar between the groups. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were bacterial or fungal infections (47 [20%] of 232 in the intravenous PEG-asparaginase group vs 51 [22%] of 231 patients in the intramuscular E colil-asparaginase group) and asparaginase-related allergic reactions (14 [6%] vs 6 [3%]).
INTERPRETATION:
Intravenous PEG-asparaginase was not more toxic than, was similarly efficacious to, and was associated with decreased anxiety compared with intramuscular native E colil-asparaginase, supporting its use as the front-line asparaginase preparation in children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.
FUNDING:
National Cancer Institute and Enzon Pharmaceuticals.
AuthorsAndrew E Place, Kristen E Stevenson, Lynda M Vrooman, Marian H Harris, Sarah K Hunt, Jane E O'Brien, Jeffrey G Supko, Barbara L Asselin, Uma H Athale, Luis A Clavell, Peter D Cole, Kara M Kelly, Caroline Laverdiere, Jean-Marie Leclerc, Bruno Michon, Marshall A Schorin, Jennifer J G Welch, Steven E Lipshultz, Jeffery L Kutok, Traci M Blonquist, Donna S Neuberg, Stephen E Sallan, Lewis B Silverman
JournalThe Lancet. Oncology (Lancet Oncol) Vol. 16 Issue 16 Pg. 1677-90 (Dec 2015) ISSN: 1474-5488 [Electronic] England
PMID26549586 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Escherichia coli Proteins
  • Polyethylene Glycols
  • pegaspargase
  • Asparaginase
Topics
  • Administration, Intravenous
  • Adolescent
  • Age Factors
  • Antineoplastic Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Asparaginase (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Canada
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Escherichia coli (enzymology)
  • Escherichia coli Proteins (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Injections, Intramuscular
  • Intention to Treat Analysis
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Polyethylene Glycols (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma (diagnosis, drug therapy, mortality)
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Quality of Life
  • Risk Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • United States

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: