HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Buffered 4% Articaine as a Primary Buccal Infiltration of the Mandibular First Molar: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study.

AbstractINTRODUCTION:
Articaine is superior to lidocaine when used as a primary buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar. Buffered local anesthetics have been purported to improve anesthetic success. Buffering a 4% articaine formulation may increase the success of a mandibular first molar buccal infiltration. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained with a buffered 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine formulation versus a nonbuffered 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine formulation as a primary buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar.
METHODS:
Eighty adults randomly received mandibular buccal infiltrations using 4% articaine with 100,000 epinephrine buffered with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate (18 mEq) and 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in a double-blind manner at 2 separate appointments. An electric pulp tester was used to test the first molar for pulpal anesthesia every 30 seconds for the first 5 minutes and every minute for the remaining 55 minutes. Successful pulpal anesthesia was defined as 2 consecutive 80/80 readings with the electric pulp tester. Pain ratings for each injection were recorded as well as the onset time of pulpal anesthesia.
RESULTS:
Anesthetic success rates for buffered articaine and nonbuffered articaine were 71% and 65%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the formulations (P = .3018). No significant differences were found between the 2 formulations for pain of injection or onset of anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS:
Buffered articaine did not provide any advantage over nonbuffered articaine for anesthetic success, anesthesia onset, or pain of injection for a primary buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar.
AuthorsRyan Shurtz, John Nusstein, Al Reader, Melissa Drum, Sara Fowler, Mike Beck
JournalJournal of endodontics (J Endod) Vol. 41 Issue 9 Pg. 1403-7 (Sep 2015) ISSN: 1878-3554 [Electronic] United States
PMID26095381 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2015 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Anesthetics, Local
  • Carticaine
  • Epinephrine
Topics
  • Adult
  • Anesthesia, Dental (methods)
  • Anesthetics, Local (administration & dosage)
  • Carticaine (administration & dosage)
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dental Pulp (drug effects)
  • Dental Pulp Test
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Epinephrine (administration & dosage)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mandible
  • Molar (drug effects)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: