Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To compare the beginning and evolution of labor variables such as demographic characteristics, obstetric and perinatal outcomes of patients with vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective and retro elective trial purposes of comparative analysis, were divided into groups by the onset of labor; spontaneously versus induction and by the labor evolution; spontaneously versus conduction. Being analyzing by Student's T and Fisher test. RESULTS: According the ACOG criteria. 136 patients with prior cesarean section were eligible to labor. The indications of previous cesarean have a trend of a non-recurring etiology, being the elective cesarean section the most common. Regarding the onset, 78% was spontaneous and 22% had an induction. Comparing the demographic characteristics it stands a greater number of deliveries, history of vaginal delivery, a higher Bishop score, fetal weight estimated lower and higher intergenesic period. As a perinatal prognosis, the study has shown be safe with a positive outcome. Conclusions: Vaginal birth after cesarean is safe, that should be offered to all women with a low transverse incision, with an intergenesic period greater than 18 months, whit a singleton pregnancy, in a cephalic presentation, with an appropriate fetal weight, and without obstetric contraindications of vaginal delivery.
|
Authors | Carlos Quesnel García-Benítez, Miguel de Jesús López-Rioja, Diana Elena Monzalbo-Núñez |
Journal | Ginecologia y obstetricia de Mexico
(Ginecol Obstet Mex)
Vol. 83
Issue 2
Pg. 69-87
(Feb 2015)
ISSN: 0300-9041 [Print] Mexico |
Vernacular Title | Parto después de cesárea una opción segura? |
PMID | 25993770
(Publication Type: English Abstract, Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Delivery, Obstetric
(methods)
- Female
- Humans
- Labor, Obstetric
- Pregnancy
- Pregnancy Outcome
- Retrospective Studies
- Vaginal Birth after Cesarean
(statistics & numerical data)
|