HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A comparison of standard and novel bronchoscopic endobronchial biopsy retrieval methods.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The targets of bronchoscopic biopsy now include not only adequate tissue for histologic diagnosis but also tissue for further analysis. We prospectively compared standard and novel bronchoscopic endobronchial biopsy (EBB) retrieval methods attempting to increase tissue yield.
METHODS:
EBB samples were retrieved using techniques A, B, and C using a standard forceps. Method A is routinely performed conventional method, where as in method B, biopsy forceps was left protruded from the bronchoscope and in method C, both valve and forceps were removed to prevent the loss of specimen. At least 6 EBB were retrieved per patient. Results were compared with gold standard composite of confirmatory pathological or clinic-radiologic follow up.
RESULTS:
A total of 42 of 43 patients completed the study. The final gold standard diagnosis was cancer [non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic, carcinoid, carcinoma in situ (24)], benign disease [sarcoid, amyloid, hamartoma, and chondroid tumor (4)], and benign/nonspecific inflammation (14). EBB retrieved using standard method A were smaller than novel methods B and C (P=0.03). However, the percentage of cases where blood was the predominant component (>50%) was less by standard methods A (4/42) than B (16/42) and C (20/42) (P=0.001). There was no difference in mean viable tumor area (n=23, sensitivity for EBB for cancer 96%) between groups A compared with B and C (P 0.27) and adequacy in benign cases by subepithelial depth (>0.3 mm) (P=0.38).
CONCLUSION:
Standard retrieval of endobronchial biopsies through the bronchoscope and cap does not reduce the size of viable tissue and reduces contaminating blood and necrotic material.
AuthorsKashif A Khan, Ciara Ryan, Louise Burke, Michael T Henry, Des M Murphy, Barry J Plant, Terry M O'Connor, David Curran, Marcus P Kennedy
JournalJournal of bronchology & interventional pulmonology (J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol) Vol. 22 Issue 2 Pg. 130-4 (Apr 2015) ISSN: 1948-8270 [Electronic] United States
PMID25887008 (Publication Type: Clinical Study, Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Topics
  • Adenocarcinoma (pathology)
  • Amyloidosis (pathology)
  • Biopsy (methods)
  • Bronchoscopy (methods)
  • Carcinoid Tumor (pathology)
  • Carcinoma (pathology)
  • Carcinoma in Situ (pathology)
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung (pathology)
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell (pathology)
  • Female
  • Hamartoma (pathology)
  • Humans
  • Lung Diseases (pathology)
  • Lung Neoplasms (pathology, secondary)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary (pathology)
  • Surgical Instruments

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: