Abstract |
The US Food and Drug Administration has scrutinized clinical trial methodology in cellulitis, partly because the definition and timing of cure are debatable. We analysed the validity of telephone self-report as a proxy for in-person follow up in a cellulitis treatment trial comparing cephalexin alone with cephalexin-plus- trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Our results demonstrate poor agreement between these two methods of outcome determination and have implications for future cellulitis clinical trial design and clinical management.
|
Authors | V E Nambudiri, R C Dwyer, C A Camargo Jr, T S Kupper, D J Pallin |
Journal | Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
(Clin Microbiol Infect)
Vol. 21
Issue 7
Pg. 676.e5-7
(Jul 2015)
ISSN: 1469-0691 [Electronic] England |
PMID | 25882364
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2015 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Chemical References |
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
- Cephalexin
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
(administration & dosage)
- Cellulitis
(drug therapy)
- Cephalexin
(administration & dosage)
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Clinical Trials as Topic
- Humans
- Interviews as Topic
- Middle Aged
- Treatment Outcome
- Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination
(administration & dosage)
- United States
- Young Adult
|