HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison between Open Epididymal Cystectomy and Minimal Resection of Epididymal Cysts Using a Scrotoscope: A Clinical Trial for the Evaluation of a New Surgical Technique.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To provide a new surgical technique for epididymal cyst (EC) treatment and to assess its safety and efficiency.
METHODS:
Forty-eight patients with symptomatic EC were randomized into 2 groups. One group (n = 23) received traditional open epididymal cystectomy (OEC) and the other group (n = 25) underwent minimal epididymal cystectomy with scrotoscope (MECS), which provided a clear vision of scrotal contents. Demographic information and perioperative and postoperative outcomes data were obtained and analyzed during a 2- to 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS:
No significant differences between the OEC and MECS groups were found in demographic information. Compared with OEC group, the MECS group had a shorter operating time (18.6 ± 2.9 vs 54.5 ± 7.0 minutes; P <.05), shorter incision length (1.1 ± 0.2 vs 4.8 ± 0.6 cm; P <.05), and less blood loss (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 17.0 ± 3.1 g; P <.05). Except for the 8.0% rate (2 of 25) of scrotal edema after MECS and 17.4% rate (4 of 23) of scrotal hematoma after OEC, both groups resulted in 0% incidence of testis or epididymis injury, wound infection, and cyst recurrence based on postoperative outcome data. Significant differences were observed after MECS compared with those after OEC based on the rates of symptom relief (95.2% vs 61.1%; P <.05) and days of wound pain (12.1 ± 2.6 vs 17.7 ± 4.1 days; P <.05).
CONCLUSION:
For the first time, our study applied scrotoscope as a new alternative technique for EC treatment. Scrotoscope provides a clear field of vision and makes tissues harvested available for pathologic examination when performing decortications of EC. The results suggest MECS may be a safe, effective, and encouraging new technique.
AuthorsJin-rui Yang, Yong-bao Wei, Bin Yan, Zhuo Yin, Yun-Liang Gao, Zhao Wang, Ke-qin Zhou
JournalUrology (Urology) Vol. 85 Issue 6 Pg. 1510-4 (Jun 2015) ISSN: 1527-9995 [Electronic] United States
PMID25868737 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Adult
  • Cysts (surgery)
  • Epididymis (surgery)
  • Genital Diseases, Male (surgery)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
  • Scrotum
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male (methods)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: