Efficacy of a prehospital self-expanding polyurethane foam for noncompressible hemorrhage under extreme operational conditions.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Noncompressible abdominal hemorrhage is a significant cause of battlefield and civilian mortality. We developed a self-expanding polyurethane foam intended to provide temporary hemorrhage control and enable evacuation to a definitive surgical capability, for casualties who would otherwise die. We hypothesized that foam treatment would be efficacious over a wide range of out-of-hospital operational conditions.

METHODS:

The foam was tested in an established lethal, closed-cavity hepatoportal injury model in four groups as follows. Group 1 involved baseline conditions, wherein foam was deployed from a pneumatically driven, first-generation delivery device at room temperature (n = 6). Group 2 involved foam deployment from a field-relevant, handheld delivery prototype (n = 12). Group 3 involved foam components that were conditioned to simulate 1-year shelf-life (n = 6). Group 4 involved foam that was conditioned to a range of temperatures (10 °C and 50 °C; n = 6 per group). In all studies, survival was monitored for up to 180 minutes and compared with an ongoing and accumulating control group with no intervention (n = 14).

RESULTS:

In Group 1 with a first-generation delivery system, foam treatment resulted in a significant survival advantage relative to the control group (p < 0.001), confirming previous results. In Group 2 with a handheld delivery system, survival was also improved, 83% at 3 hours, compared with 7% in the control group (p < 0.001). In Group 3, survival was 83% at 3 hours (p = 0.002). In Group 4 at temperature extremes, 3-hour survival was 83% (p = 0.002) and 67% (p = 0.014) in the low- and high-temperature groups, respectively. Temperature extremes did not result in hypothermia, hyperthermia, or thermal injury. In all studies, the bleeding rate in foam groups was significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

Under a range of military operational conditions, foam treatment resulted in a survival advantage relative to the control group. This supports the feasibility of foam treatment as a prehospital hemostatic bridge to surgery for severely bleeding causalities.

• Authors: Adam P Rago, Andreas Larentzakis, John Marini, Abby Picard, Michael J Duggan, Rany Busold, Marc Helmick, Greg Zugates, John Beagle, Upma Sharma, David R King
• Journal: The journal of trauma and acute care surgery (J Trauma Acute Care Surg) Vol. 78 Issue 2 Pg. 324-9 (Feb 2015) ISSN: 2163-0763 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 25757118 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.)

Chemical References

• Hemostatics
• Polyurethanes
• polyurethane foam

Topics

• Abdominal Injuries (complications)
• Animals
• Emergency Treatment
• Hemorrhage (etiology, prevention & control)
• Hemostatic Techniques
• Hemostatics (pharmacology)
• Military Medicine
• Polyurethanes (pharmacology)
• Reproducibility of Results
• Swine