Abstract | BACKGROUND: Patch testing is thought to be necessary prior to metal device implantation to rule out metal allergy-related complications; however, there are controversies over the effects of nickel allergy on the outcome of nickel alloy-based device implantation. OBJECTIVE: METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ASD closure with a nitinol device. RESULTS: Among 38 patients who had ASD closure, 4 of 5 nickel-allergic patients and 10 of the 33 non- nickel-allergic patients had post-closure complications. All patients fared well, without device failure culminating in device removal. CONCLUSION: In this study, positive reactions to nickel in a patch test were not associated with adverse early or late outcomes following ASD closure with a nickel alloy-based device.
|
Authors | Hee Joo Kim, Jung U Shin, Jungsoo Lee, Hemin Lee, Shan Jin, Seo Hyeong Kim, Ji Yeon Noh, Kwang Hoon Lee |
Journal | Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland)
(Dermatology)
Vol. 230
Issue 2
Pg. 184-8
( 2015)
ISSN: 1421-9832 [Electronic] Switzerland |
PMID | 25634825
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Copyright | © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel. |
Chemical References |
- titanium nickelide
- Nickel
- Titanium
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Female
- Heart Septal Defects, Atrial
(therapy)
- Humans
- Hypersensitivity
(diagnosis)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Migraine Disorders
(etiology)
- Nickel
(adverse effects)
- Patch Tests
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Retrospective Studies
- Septal Occluder Device
(adverse effects)
- Titanium
(adverse effects)
- Young Adult
|