HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

AbstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
A number of studies have suggested that anesthesia type (conscious sedation versus general anesthesia) during intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke has implications for patient outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the clinical and angiographic outcomes of the 2 anesthesia types.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
In March 2014, we conducted a computerized search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for reports on anesthesia and endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: recanalization rate, good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2), asymptomatic and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, death, vascular complications, respiratory complications, procedure time, time to groin, and time from symptom onset to recanalization.
RESULTS:
Nine studies enrolling 1956 patients (814 with general anesthesia and 1142 with conscious sedation) were included. Compared with patients treated by using conscious sedation during stroke intervention, patients undergoing general anesthesia had higher odds of death (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.87-3.58) and respiratory complications (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.36-3.23) and lower odds of good functional outcome (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.35-0.53) and successful angiographic outcome (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.80). No difference in procedure time (P = .28) was seen between the groups. Preintervention NIHSS scores were available from 6 studies; in those, patients receiving general anesthesia had a higher average NIHSS score.
CONCLUSIONS:
Patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intra-arterial therapy may have worse outcomes with general anesthesia compared with conscious sedation. However, the difference in stroke severity at the onset may confound the comparison in the available studies; thus, a randomized trial is necessary to confirm this association.
AuthorsW Brinjikji, M H Murad, A A Rabinstein, H J Cloft, G Lanzino, D F Kallmes
JournalAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology (AJNR Am J Neuroradiol) Vol. 36 Issue 3 Pg. 525-9 (Mar 2015) ISSN: 1936-959X [Electronic] United States
PMID25395655 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review)
Copyright© 2015 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.
Topics
  • Anesthesia, General
  • Brain Ischemia (drug therapy, surgery, therapy)
  • Cerebral Angiography
  • Conscious Sedation
  • Endovascular Procedures (methods)
  • Humans
  • Recovery of Function
  • Stroke (drug therapy, physiopathology, surgery, therapy)
  • Thrombectomy
  • Thrombolytic Therapy (methods)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: