HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with patent foramen ovale and intracardiac devices.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
This study investigated whether patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) have an increased risk of stroke due to permanent pacemaker (PPM)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation.
BACKGROUND:
Data are lacking on the risk of stroke in patients with PFO and implantable intracardiac devices, either a PPM or an ICD. We investigated whether patients with PFO have increased risk of stroke due to PPM/ICD implantation.
METHODS:
Between 2001 and 2008, 2,921 consecutive patients with PFO (67.5 ± 16.4 years of age, 52.2% male) were identified from our echocardiography database. These patients were divided into a device group (patients had PPM/ICD implantation for any reason after receiving a diagnosis of PFO) and a no device group (patients did not have PPM or ICD implantation). Patients who had PFO closure during follow-up were excluded. Both groups were matched for baseline characteristics and medications. The incidence of ischemic stroke was assessed in each group after propensity score matching (case:control ratio of 1:1 yielding 231 pairs). All patients completed at least 4 years of follow-up until May 2012.
RESULTS:
There were 2,690 patients in the n device group (67.3 ± 16.4 years of age, 51.6% male) and 231 patients in the device group (75.4 ± 14.6 years of age, 59.3% male). Six patients (2.6%) in the no device group and 6 (2.6%) in the device group had a stroke during the follow-up period. No difference in the rate of stroke, transient ischemic stroke, or stroke/transient ischemic stroke was observed between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
The risk of stroke in patients with PFO and an implantable intracardiac device is similar to those without an intracardiac device. In patients with PFO, without a history of stroke, device implantation might not be considered a risk factor for future stroke occurrence.
AuthorsKanhaiya L Poddar, Vijaiganesh Nagarajan, Amar Krishnaswamy, Navkaranbir S Bajaj, Meera Kumari, Hazem Bdair, Dhruv Modi, Shikhar Agarwal, Sachin S Goel, Akhil Parashar, E Murat Tuzcu, Samir R Kapadia
JournalJACC. Cardiovascular interventions (JACC Cardiovasc Interv) Vol. 7 Issue 11 Pg. 1221-6 (Nov 2014) ISSN: 1876-7605 [Electronic] United States
PMID25326741 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Brain Ischemia (diagnosis, epidemiology)
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial (adverse effects)
  • Comorbidity
  • Databases, Factual
  • Defibrillators, Implantable (adverse effects)
  • Electric Countershock (adverse effects, instrumentation)
  • Female
  • Foramen Ovale, Patent (diagnosis, epidemiology)
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ohio (epidemiology)
  • Pacemaker, Artificial (adverse effects)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke (diagnosis, epidemiology)
  • Time Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: