Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Science Citation Index and momentous meeting abstracts were searched and evaluated by two reviewers independently. RESULTS: Nine trials involving 849 patients were analyzed. Meta-analysis showed there was no significant difference in technical success rate (RR 1.0, 95% CI [0.98, 1.01]), clinical success rate (RR 1.04, 95% CI [0.98, 1.11]), post-stenting dysphagia score (WMD -0.01, 95% CI [-0.52, 0.50]), stent patency (WMD -0.31, 95% CI [-1.73, 1.11]), overall complications (RR 1.07, 95% CI [0.87, 1.32]) and reintervention rate (RR 1.30, 95% CI [0.92, 1.83]) between covered and uncovered SEMSs group. However, covered SEMSs were associated with higher migration rate (RR 3.48, 95% CI [2.16, 5.62], P < 0.00001) and lower obstruction rate (RR 0.42, 95% CI [0.24, 0.73], P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Ya-min Pan, Ji Pan, Li-kun Guo, Min Qiu, Jia-jun Zhang |
Journal | BMC gastroenterology
(BMC Gastroenterol)
Vol. 14
Pg. 170
(Sep 30 2014)
ISSN: 1471-230X [Electronic] England |
PMID | 25270550
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review)
|
Topics |
- Equipment Design
- Foreign-Body Migration
- Gastric Outlet Obstruction
(etiology, surgery)
- Humans
- Palliative Care
(methods)
- Recurrence
- Reoperation
- Stents
(adverse effects)
|