HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Aided cortical response, speech intelligibility, consonant perception and functional performance of young children using conventional amplification or nonlinear frequency compression.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to compare conventional processing with nonlinear frequency compression (NLFC) in hearing aids for young children with bilateral hearing loss.
METHODS:
Sixty-four children aged between 2 and 7 years with bilateral hearing aids were recruited. Evaluations of cortical responses, speech intelligibility rating, consonant perception and functional performance were completed with the children wearing their personal hearing aids with conventional processing. The children were then refitted with new hearing aids with NLFC processing. Following a six-week familiarization period, they were evaluated again while using their hearing aids with NLFC activated.
RESULTS:
The mean speech intelligibility rating and the number of cortical responses present for /s/were significantly higher when children were using NLFC processing than conventional processing in their hearing aids (p<0.05). Parents judged the children's functional real life performance with the NLFC hearing aids to be similar or better than that with the children's own hearing aids in both quiet and noisy situations. The mean percent consonant score was higher with NLFC processing compared to conventional processing, but the difference did not reach the 5% significance level (p=0.056). An overall figure of merit (FOM) was calculated by averaging the standardized difference scores between processing schemes for all measures. Regression analysis revealed that, on average, greater advantage for NLFC processing was associated with poorer hearing at 4 kHz.
CONCLUSIONS:
Compared to conventional processing, the use of NLFC was, on average, effective in increasing audibility of /s/as measured by cortical evaluations, and higher ratings on speech intelligibility and functional performance in real life by parents. On average, greater benefits from NLFC processing was associated with poorer hearing at 4 kHz.
AuthorsVicky W Zhang, Teresa Y C Ching, Patricia Van Buynder, Sanna Hou, Christopher Flynn, Lauren Burns, Karen McGhie, Angela O C Wong
JournalInternational journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology (Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol) Vol. 78 Issue 10 Pg. 1692-700 (Oct 2014) ISSN: 1872-8464 [Electronic] Ireland
PMID25128447 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Topics
  • Cerebral Cortex (physiology)
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory (physiology)
  • Female
  • Hearing (physiology)
  • Hearing Aids
  • Hearing Loss, Bilateral (physiopathology, therapy)
  • Humans
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Perception
  • Speech Intelligibility (physiology)
  • Speech Perception (physiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: