Abstract | AIM: MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with three sites having a probing depth of 5-8mm were considered for the study. Sites were numbered 1, 2, 3 randomly. The clinical parameters assessed were the Plaque Index (PI), gingival index (GI), Bleeding on probing (BOP), Clinical attachment level (CAL) and Probing pocket depth ( PPD). Following baseline evaluation, on two sites scaling and root planing (SRP) was performed, no treatment was carried out in the third site. Chlorhexidine chips were placed on one site with SRP and another without SRP. A periodontal pack was placed on the site to prevent dislodgement of the CHX chip. Clinical parameters were recorded at baseline, one month and three months. Duration of the study was for three months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: T-test and Analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been carried out in the present study. RESULTS: All three groups presented with an improvement in the clinical parameters compared to baseline. There was no statistically significant difference between the SRP and SRP + CHIP group in all parameters. There was a significant difference when these two groups were compared to the chip alone group. The mean reductions in PPD were 2.8mm (SRP group), 2.6 (SRP+CHIP group), 0.8 (chip alone group) The mean gain in CAL were 2.8mm (SRP group), 2.5 (SRP+CHIP group), 0.7 (chip alone group). Reduction in bleeding on probing were significant for the SRP and SRP +CHIP group but not for the chip alone group. CONCLUSION: The CHX chip did not provide any clinical benefit beyond that achieved with conventional scaling and rootplaning after a three month period.
|
Authors | Sangeetha Medaiah, M Srinivas, Anil Melath, Suragimath Girish, Tejaswin Polepalle, Ankineedu Babu Dasari |
Journal | Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR
(J Clin Diagn Res)
Vol. 8
Issue 6
Pg. ZC22-5
(Jun 2014)
ISSN: 2249-782X [Print] India |
PMID | 25121059
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|