Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: We conducted a strict, stepwise, fixed-effects meta-analysis with predefined heterogeneity quality criteria to generate the most appropriate common estimates for twice-daily (BID) or once-daily (QD) dosing regimens. An indirect comparison of these dosing regimens with fixed-effects meta-analysis common estimates (where available), or individual compound results, was done respectively. RESULTS: Comparing indirectly BID vs QD dosing regimens resulted in hazard ratios (HR [95% confidence interval]) for stroke and systemic embolism of 0.75 (0.58-0.96) for dabigatran 150 mg BID, and 0.91 (0.73-1.13) for apixaban BID vs the QD dosing regimen. For ischemic stroke, the HR of BID vs QD was 0.85 (0.69-1.05). For intracranial hemorrhage, BID vs rivaroxaban QD was 0.57 (0.37-0.88) and, vs edoxaban QD, 0.81 (0.54-1.22). Due to heterogeneity, common estimates for major bleeding QD or BID were not justified, therefore indirect comparison of regimens were not possible. All non- vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants reduced all-cause mortality vs warfarin with a HR of 0.90 (0.86-0.96) without differences between regimen. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Andreas Clemens, Herbert Noack, Martina Brueckmann, Gregory Y H Lip |
Journal | PloS one
(PLoS One)
Vol. 9
Issue 6
Pg. e99276
( 2014)
ISSN: 1932-6203 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 24911432
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Administration, Oral
- Anticoagulants
(administration & dosage, pharmacokinetics)
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Humans
- Premedication
- Stroke
(etiology, mortality, prevention & control)
- Treatment Outcome
|