HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A clinical trial testing the efficacy of PDT in preventing amputation in diabetic patients.

Abstract
The feet of diabetic patients continue to be an unsolved problem in medicine. Uncontrolled neuropathy, ulceration and infection usually lead to amputation and presently there is no effective and reliable method that can be used to provide an efficient cure. Overall improvement in the salvage strategies, based on comprehensive pre-clinical evaluation, debridement, antibiotic therapy and follow up, has shown improvements in certain hospital settings, but the general picture for patients with diabetic foot is to have some sort of amputation, especially in underserved populations. It is clearly necessary to develop novel treatment strategies for this worldwide health problem. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a treatment modality that uses light to generate in situ reactive oxygen species, which can cause cell death. PDT can be used to treat several diseases, including foot infections that do not respond well to antibiotic therapy. There are several characteristics of PDT that make it potentially ideal to treat diabetic feet: the photosensitizer is non-toxic in the dark, but after illumination it becomes a very efficient antimicrobial agent with topical use, and it can regenerate small bones, such as the phalanges. However, PDT is still not used in clinical practice to treat diabetic feet. Therefore, we decided to perform a clinical study to prove that PDT is an effective method to avoid amputation of infected diabetic feet. An inexpensive PDT protocol was developed and applied to 18 patients with osteomyelitis, classified as Grade 3 on the Wagner scale. Only one of these patients suffered amputation. At least two of them were cured from resistant bacteria strains without intravenous antibiotic therapy. In the control group of 16 patients, all of them ended up suffering amputation. The rate of amputation in the PDT group was 0.029 times the rate in the control group and the difference is clearly statistically significant (p=0.002).
AuthorsJoão Paulo Tardivo, Fernando Adami, João Antonio Correa, Maria Aparecida S Pinhal, Mauricio S Baptista
JournalPhotodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy (Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther) Vol. 11 Issue 3 Pg. 342-50 (Sep 2014) ISSN: 1873-1597 [Electronic] Netherlands
PMID24814697 (Publication Type: Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Drug Combinations
  • Radiation-Sensitizing Agents
  • Tolonium Chloride
  • Methylene Blue
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Amputation, Surgical
  • Diabetic Foot (therapy)
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Methylene Blue (administration & dosage)
  • Middle Aged
  • Organ Sparing Treatments (methods)
  • Osteomyelitis (therapy)
  • Photochemotherapy (methods)
  • Radiation-Sensitizing Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Tolonium Chloride (administration & dosage)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: