HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[Experimental study of glyceraldehyde cross-linking of posterior scleral on FDM in guinea pigs].

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study is to observe the effects of glyceraldehyde cross-linking on sclera biomechanical strength and experimental myopia.
METHODS:
50 three weeks aged guinea pigs were randomly divided into 5 groups: A, B, C, D, E. Each group had 10 guinea pigs. The right eye was set as the experimental eye, the left eye was used as control. Group A: 7 days mask; Group B: 21 days mask, plus physiological saline retrobulbar injection at mask day 1, 8, 15; Group C: 21 days mask, plus 0.05 mol/L glyceraldehyde retrobulbar injection at mask day 1, 8, 15; Group D: 21 days mask, plus 0.5 mol/L glyceraldehyde retrobulbar injection at mask day 1, 8, 15; Group E: normal control group. Several parameters of 7 guinea pigs of each group were measured before and after deprivation (mask day 7, 14, 21), including ocular axial length, refractive error, ultimate stress (σmax) (MPa), ultimate strain(εmax) (%) and 6% elastic modulus (MPa). The effects of glyceraldehyde on adjacent tissues of the rest 3 guinea pigs were detected by histopathological and immunohistochemical studies. Differences between experiment eyes and contralateral, eyes were compared with paired t test and correlative analysis.
RESULTS:
The experimental eyes appeared the increase of the the vitreous cavity length, the axial length and myopia after deprivation. In group A, group B and group C, the differences of the length of the vitreous cavity (group A (2.991 ± 0.078) mm, group B (2.961 ± 0.038) mm and group C (2.936 ± 0.021) mm), the axial length(group A (7.263 ± 0.133) mm, group B (7.732 ± 0.099) mm and group C (7.665 ± 0.055) mm) and refractive error (group A (-2.214 ± 2.881) D, group B (-4.525 ± 2.415) D and group C (-1.607 ± 0.866) D) between the experimental eye and the fellow eye was statistically significant (vitreous cavity = 3.234, 4.758, 7.608; Pvitreous cavity = 0.018, 0.002, 0.001; axial = 3.198,, 4.758, 7.608; Paxial = 0.019, 0.002, 0.000; refraction = -7.120, -4.020, -6.334; Prefraction = 0.000, 0.005, 0.001). In group D and group E, there is no difference between deprived eye and control eye about the length of the vitreous chamber as well as axial length (vitreous = 0.542, -0.646; Pvitreous cavity = 0.607, 0.539; axial = 0.542, -0.646; Paxial = 0.607, 0.539). The experimental eye ((-3.921 ± 0.874)D) and the fellow eye ((-3.321 ± 1.205)D) of group D, the difference of diopter was statistically significant (refraction = -3.154, Prefraction = 0.020). At the end of the experiment, the change of diopter of experimental eye of group B, C, D, E was significantly different (F = 61.249, P = 0.000). The difference of diopter change between group B ((8.800 ± 0.616) D), group C ( (7.236 ± 2.198) D), group D ( (6.271 ± 1.112) D) and the normal control group ((0.934 ± 0.158) D) was statistically significant (PB = 0.000, PC = 0.000, PD = 0.000). At the end of the experiment, the ultimate stress and 6% elastic modulus of group B experimental eye was (7.988 ± 3.677) MPa (P = 0.002) and (19.938 ± 4.871) MPa (P = 0.001), decreased 10.06% and 34.17% respectively. On the other hand the ultimate strain was (28.6 ± 3.6) % (P = 0.034), increased 19.17%. After the cross-linking treatment, the ultimate stress and 6% elastic modulus of group C experimental eye was (9.244 ± 0.806) MPa (P = 0.001) and (26.180 ± 4.388) MPa (P = 0.031) , decreased 23.13% and 13.34%, the ultimate strain was (26.2 ± 1.0) % (P = 0.016) , increased 12.93% separately. The ultimate stress of group D experimental eye was (12.476 ± 2.507) MPa (P = 0.580), decreased 5.50%, 6% elastic modulus was (30.446 ± 3.410) MPa (P = 0.314), increased 6.53%, ultimate strain was (23.8 ± 1.8) % (P = 0.253), decreased 4.42% respectively. Ultrastructure examination showed that, decreased scleral thickness with fibers lined up in order, without inflammatory cells Infiltration. Expressions of matrix metalloproteinases-2(MMP-2) mainly decrease in the episcleral tissue. The stroma of choroid, and the outer plexiform layer.
CONCLUSIONS:
Glyceraldehyde is a safe and effective cross-linking agent that could significantly enhance the sclera biomechanical strength. Glyceraldehyde cross-linking method could effectively control the development of myopia in animal model.
AuthorsYing Wang, Quanhong Han, Fengmei Han, Yanhua Chu, Kanxing Zhao
Journal[Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology (Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi) Vol. 50 Issue 1 Pg. 51-9 (Jan 2014) ISSN: 0412-4081 [Print] China
PMID24709134 (Publication Type: English Abstract, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Cross-Linking Reagents
  • Glyceraldehyde
Topics
  • Animals
  • Cross-Linking Reagents (chemistry)
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Form Perception
  • Glyceraldehyde (chemistry)
  • Guinea Pigs
  • Myopia (drug therapy, pathology)
  • Sclera (physiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: