Abstract | BACKGROUND:
Macrolides are prescribed in the treatment of pityriasis rosea despite conflicting results of the limited number of studies evaluating their role in its treatment. AIM: METHODS: Seventy patients of pityriasis rosea were given either azithromycin (n=35) or placebo (n=35) and were followed-up at 2, 4 and 6 weeks. Pruritus was assessed in both groups using the visual analogue scale (VAS) . Change in the pityriasis rosea severity score (PRSS) and in the VAS were recorded as outcome measures and were compared statistically. RESULTS: The decrease in PRSS from baseline through 2, 4 and 6 weeks within both treatment (P<0.001) and placebo (P<0.001) arms was found to be statistically significant; however, this change was not significantly different in the two groups (P=0.179). Similarly, the decrease in VAS was found to be statistically significant within both groups (P<0.001); however, the change was comparable between the two groups (P<0.937). Analysis by Fisher's exact test did not find a significant difference between the two groups for PRSS and VAS. CONCLUSION:
|
Authors | Deepika Pandhi, Archana Singal, Prashant Verma, Reena Sharma |
Journal | Indian journal of dermatology, venereology and leprology
(Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol)
2014 Jan-Feb
Vol. 80
Issue 1
Pg. 36-40
ISSN: 0973-3922 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 24448121
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Azithromycin
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
(therapeutic use)
- Azithromycin
(therapeutic use)
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Pityriasis Rosea
(complications, drug therapy)
- Prospective Studies
- Pruritus
(etiology)
- Severity of Illness Index
- Young Adult
|