Abstract | BACKGROUND: MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using median overall survival (mOS) and survival gain, we compared the efficacy of chemotherapy drugs in a meta-analysis of 624 HGG studies, including 44,850 patients from studies published between 1976 and 2011. RESULTS: Patient cohorts treated with etoposide had significant improvement in mOS (15.66 months vs. 13.27 months, p=0.026, 49 vs. 795 cohorts) and significant survival gain advantage (p=0.022) over cohorts treated without etoposide. In contrast, patient cohorts treated with irinotecan had significantly worse mOS (10.20 vs. 13.55 months, p=0.008, 35 vs. 810 cohorts) and a disadvantage compared to cohorts treated without irinotecan in survival gain analysis. CONCLUSION: Results from this analysis suggest that etoposide may improve overall survival for patients with HGG, whereas the use of irinotecan might result in inferior outcomes.
|
Authors | Alexis Leonard, Johannes E Wolff |
Journal | Anticancer research
(Anticancer Res)
Vol. 33
Issue 8
Pg. 3307-15
(Aug 2013)
ISSN: 1791-7530 [Electronic] Greece |
PMID | 23898097
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis)
|
Chemical References |
- Topoisomerase Inhibitors
- Etoposide
|
Topics |
- Brain Neoplasms
(drug therapy)
- Cohort Studies
- Demography
- Etoposide
(therapeutic use)
- Female
- Glioma
(drug therapy)
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Survival Analysis
- Topoisomerase Inhibitors
(therapeutic use)
|