HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of complication rates in dogs with nasoesophageal versus nasogastric feeding tubes.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To compare complication rates between nasoesophageal (NE) and nasogastric (NG) feeding tubes in dogs.
DESIGN:
Retrospective study.
SETTING:
University referral veterinary hospital.
ANIMALS:
A total of 46 dogs that were fed through a NE (n = 28) or NG (n = 18) tube between January 2007 and December 2011 and that also had either thoracic radiography or computed tomography performed so that location of the distal tip of the tube in either the esophagus or stomach could be confirmed.
INTERVENTIONS:
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
The medical record of each eligible case was reviewed and data recorded included signalment, underlying disease, body weight, body condition score, medications, duration of feeding, diet used, and complications observed (ie, vomiting, regurgitation, diarrhea, early tube removal, clogged tube, epistaxis, pulmonary aspiration, hyperglycemia, and refeeding syndrome). Dogs with NE tubes were significantly younger than dogs with NG tubes (P = 0.03) but there were no other significant differences in signalment, underlying disease, medications, duration of anorexia, percent of resting energy requirement achieved, or change in weight during tube feeding. There also was no significant difference between the NE and NG groups for any of the recorded complications. Significantly fewer dogs in the NE group died or were euthanized (3/28) compared to the NG group (7/18; P = 0.02) but outcome was not associated with age, underlying disease, or any of the recorded tube complications.
CONCLUSIONS:
This study did not identify a difference in complication rate between NE and NG feeding tubes in dogs. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal terminal location of feeding tubes in dogs.
AuthorsMelissa K Yu, Lisa M Freeman, Cailin R Heinze, Valerie J Parker, Deborah E Linder
JournalJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) (J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)) 2013 May-Jun Vol. 23 Issue 3 Pg. 300-4 ISSN: 1476-4431 [Electronic] United States
PMID23621520 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2013.
Topics
  • Animals
  • Diarrhea (etiology, veterinary)
  • Dog Diseases (etiology)
  • Dogs
  • Epistaxis (etiology, veterinary)
  • Female
  • Hyperglycemia (etiology, veterinary)
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal (adverse effects, veterinary)
  • Male
  • Pneumonia, Aspiration (etiology, veterinary)
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Vomiting (etiology, veterinary)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: