Abstract | BACKGROUND:
Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) comprise the most popular form of reversible contraception. Uterine perforation is a rare but potentially serious complication associated with their use. We examined all reported cases of elective surgical removal of peritoneally migrated IUCDs, to compare laparoscopic and open approaches, and to identify beneficial surgical techniques. DATABASE: DISCUSSION: We identified 129 cases, reported in 30 studies. In the majority of cases (93.0% [120/129]), surgery was attempted laparoscopically; however 22.5% (27/120) of surgeries were converted to open operations, giving an overall rate of open surgery of 27.9% (36/129). This systematic review supports the use of laparoscopic surgery for elective removal of migrated IUCDs from the peritoneal cavity. With complications rarely reported, it is also likely the procedure could be undertaken in an outpatient setting. The use of intraoperative adjuncts (ie, cystoscopy) and the rate of conversion to open surgery are influenced by the site of the IUCD. Therefore, accurate preoperative localization of the device is advised.
|
Authors | Frances R Mosley, Navneel Shahi, Mohamed A Kurer |
Journal | JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
(JSLS)
2012 Apr-Jun
Vol. 16
Issue 2
Pg. 236-41
ISSN: 1086-8089 [Print] United States |
PMID | 23477171
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Review, Systematic Review)
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Elective Surgical Procedures
(methods)
- Female
- Humans
- Intrauterine Device Migration
- Laparoscopy
- Peritoneal Cavity
(surgery)
- Treatment Outcome
|