HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Brucellosis is a persistent health problem in many developing countries throughout the world, and the search for simple and effective treatment continues to be of great importance.
METHODS AND FINDINGS:
A search was conducted in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Clinical trials published from 1985 to present that assess different antimicrobial regimens in cases of documented acute uncomplicated human brucellosis were included. The primary outcomes were relapse, therapeutic failure, combined variable of relapse and therapeutic failure, and adverse effect rates. A meta-analysis with a fixed effect model was performed and odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A random effect model was used when significant heterogeneity between studies was verified. Comparison of combined doxycycline and rifampicin with a combination of doxycycline and streptomycin favors the latter regimen (OR = 3.17; CI95% = 2.05-4.91). There were no significant differences between combined doxycycline-streptomycin and combined doxycycline-gentamicin (OR = 1.89; CI95% = 0.81-4.39). Treatment with rifampicin and quinolones was similar to combined doxycycline-rifampicin (OR = 1.23; CI95% = 0.63-2.40). Only one study assessed triple therapy with aminoglycoside-doxycycline-rifampicin and only included patients with uncomplicated brucellosis. Thus this approach cannot be considered the therapy of choice until further studies have been performed. Combined doxycycline/co-trimoxazole or doxycycline monotherapy could represent a cost-effective alternative in certain patient groups, and further studies are needed in the future.
CONCLUSIONS:
Although the preferred treatment in uncomplicated human brucellosis is doxycycline-aminoglycoside combination, other treatments based on oral regimens or monotherapy should not be rejected until they are better studied. Triple therapy should not be considered the current treatment of choice.
AuthorsJulián Solís García del Pozo, Javier Solera
JournalPloS one (PLoS One) Vol. 7 Issue 2 Pg. e32090 ( 2012) ISSN: 1932-6203 [Electronic] United States
PMID22393379 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review, Systematic Review)
Chemical References
  • Aminoglycosides
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Quinolones
  • Doxycycline
  • Rifampin
  • Streptomycin
Topics
  • Aminoglycosides (therapeutic use)
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents (economics, therapeutic use)
  • Brucellosis (therapy)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Doxycycline (administration & dosage)
  • Drug Costs
  • Drug Therapy, Combination (economics, methods)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Odds Ratio
  • Quinolones (administration & dosage)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Rifampin (administration & dosage)
  • Streptomycin (administration & dosage)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: