HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Daptomycin versus vancomycin in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis rabbit model: bactericidal effect, safety, and ocular pharmacokinetics.

Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of acute endophthalmitis, and infection with this virulent bacterium is often associated with a poor visual outcome. In this study, we investigated the bactericidal efficacy and the safety of intravitreal daptomycin (DAP), a lipopeptide antibiotic with broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive bacteria, compared with those of intravitreal vancomycin (VAN) in a methicillin-resistant S. aureus endophthalmitis rabbit model. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of daptomycin in the infected eyes were also studied. Rabbits were randomly divided into three treatment groups (n = 8) and one untreated group (n = 4), to compare the effect of single intravitreal injections of 0.2 mg and 1 mg of daptomycin (DAP 0.2 and DAP 1 groups, respectively) with that of 1 mg of intravitreal vancomycin (VAN 1 group). Vitreal aspirates were regularly collected and grading of ocular inflammation was regularly performed until euthanasia on day 7. In the DAP 0.2 group, 62.5% of the eyes were sterilized and the mean bacterial count presented a reduction of 1 log unit. In the DAP 1 and VAN 1 groups, the infection was eradicated (100% and 87.5% of eyes sterilized, respectively), with a 4-log-unit reduction of the mean bacterial count. The bactericidal efficacy in the DAP 1 group was not inferior to that in the VAN 1 group and was superior to that of the other regimens in limiting the ocular inflammation and preserving the architecture of the ocular structures (P < 0.05). The elimination half-life (t(1/2β)) of daptomycin was independent of the administered dose (38.8 ± 16.5 h and 40.9 ± 6.7 h, respectively, for the DAP 0.2 and DAP 1 groups) and was significantly longer than the t(1/2β) of vancomycin (20.5 ± 2.0 h for the VAN 1 group) (P < 0.05). This antibiotic could therefore be considered for the treatment of intraocular infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria.
AuthorsSophie Lefèvre, Maher Saleh, Luc Marcellin, Audrey Subilia, Tristan Bourcier, Gilles Prévost, François Jehl
JournalAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy (Antimicrob Agents Chemother) Vol. 56 Issue 5 Pg. 2485-92 (May 2012) ISSN: 1098-6596 [Electronic] United States
PMID22371888 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Vancomycin
  • Daptomycin
Topics
  • Animals
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents (administration & dosage, pharmacokinetics)
  • Biological Availability
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Daptomycin (administration & dosage, pharmacokinetics)
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
  • Endophthalmitis (drug therapy, microbiology, pathology)
  • Eye (drug effects, microbiology, pathology)
  • Female
  • Half-Life
  • Intravitreal Injections
  • Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (drug effects, physiology)
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Rabbits
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Staphylococcal Infections (drug therapy, microbiology, pathology)
  • Vancomycin (administration & dosage, pharmacokinetics)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: