HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Vision Restoration Therapy (VRT) aims to improve visual field function by systematically training regions of residual vision associated with the activity of suboptimal firing neurons within the occipital cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to modulate cortical excitability.
OBJECTIVE:
Assess the possible efficacy of tDCS combined with VRT.
METHODS:
The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, demonstration-of-concept pilot study where participants were assigned to either VRT and tDCS or VRT and sham. The anode was placed over the occipital pole to target both affected and unaffected lobes. One hour training sessions were carried out 3 times per week for 3 months in a laboratory. Outcome measures included objective and subjective changes in visual field, recording of visual fixation performance, and vision-related activities of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life (QOL).
RESULTS:
Although 12 participants were enrolled, only 8 could be analyzed. The VRT and tDCS group demonstrated significantly greater expansion in visual field and improvement on ADLs compared with the VRT and sham group. Contrary to expectations, subjective perception of visual field change was greater in the VRT and sham group. QOL did not change for either group. The observed changes in visual field were unrelated to compensatory eye movements, as shown with fixation monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS:
The combination of occipital cortical tDCS with visual field rehabilitation appears to enhance visual functional outcomes compared with visual rehabilitation alone. TDCS may enhance inherent mechanisms of plasticity associated with training.
AuthorsEla B Plow, Souzana N Obretenova, Felipe Fregni, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Lotfi B Merabet
JournalNeurorehabilitation and neural repair (Neurorehabil Neural Repair) 2012 Jul-Aug Vol. 26 Issue 6 Pg. 616-26 ISSN: 1552-6844 [Electronic] United States
PMID22291042 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Electric Stimulation Therapy
  • Eye Movements (physiology)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hemianopsia (physiopathology, rehabilitation)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Recovery of Function (physiology)
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Therapy, Computer-Assisted
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Visual Field Tests
  • Visual Fields (physiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: