HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

First-line treatment of metastatic or locally advanced unresectable soft tissue sarcomas with conatumumab in combination with doxorubicin or doxorubicin alone: a phase I/II open-label and double-blind study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Conatumumab is a fully human monoclonal agonist antibody that binds to death receptor 5 and induces apoptosis in sensitive cells. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of doxorubicin ± conatumumab as first-line systemic therapy for metastatic or locally advanced/unresectable soft-tissue sarcoma.
METHODS:
In Phase I, six patients received doxorubicin (75 mg/m2) with conatumumab (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. In Phase II, patients were randomised (2:1) to receive doxorubicin with either double-blind conatumumab 15 mg/kg (conatumumab-doxorubicin; n=86) or placebo (placebo-doxorubicin; n=42). Patients who progressed on placebo-doxorubicin could receive open-label conatumumab monotherapy post-chemotherapy (n=21).
FINDINGS:
The expected histopathologic subtypes (e.g. leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, others) were represented in this trial. No unexpected adverse events were noted in either Phase I or II. Median progression-free survival in Phase II was 5.6 and 6.4 months in the conatumumab-doxorubicin and placebo-doxorubicin arms, respectively (stratified HR: 1.00; p=0.973), with more early progressions noted in the first 3.5 months in the conatumumab-doxorubicin arm. Median overall survival was not reached after 8.6 months median follow-up in either arm. Common adverse events were nausea (conatumumab-doxorubicin: 66%; placebo-doxorubicin: 80%), alopecia (55%; 63%), fatigue (60%; 38%) and neutropenia (32%; 50%). Post-chemotherapy results were not notably improved by conatumumab dosing.
INTERPRETATION:
Addition of conatumumab to doxorubicin appeared to be safe but did not improve disease control in a heterogeneous unselected group of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. The results of this trial are very useful for estimating the outcomes of first-line therapy of sarcoma patients treated with standard doxorubicin.
AuthorsGeorge D Demetri, Axel Le Cesne, Sant P Chawla, Thomas Brodowicz, Robert G Maki, Bruce A Bach, Dominic P Smethurst, Sarah Bray, Yong-jiang Hei, Jean-Yves Blay
JournalEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) (Eur J Cancer) Vol. 48 Issue 4 Pg. 547-63 (Mar 2012) ISSN: 1879-0852 [Electronic] England
PMID22240283 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase I, Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
CopyrightCopyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Chemical References
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Placebos
  • conatumumab
  • Doxorubicin
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Algorithms
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Disease Progression
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Doxorubicin (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Placebos
  • Sarcoma (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Soft Tissue Neoplasms (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: