Simple calcaneal bone cysts: a pilot study comparing open versus endoscopic curettage and grafting.

Abstract

This pilot study analysed the outcome of open versus endoscopic curettage and bone grafting for the treatment of simple calcaneal bone cysts. A total of 26 patients were evaluated into two equal groups: group 1 was treated with traditional open curettage and bone grafting and group 2 was treated with endoscopic curettage and percutaneous bone grafting. Cyst size, operating time, length of stay, time to healing, complications, further surgery and radiological healing were recorded and differences were statistically compared. The mean age of the patients was 22.9 years (18 to 28) and the mean follow-up was 28.7 months (24 to 36). There were no statistically significant differences in regard to age of patients, cyst size and the follow-up periods in the two groups. The operating time and mean length of stay of group 2 patients was significantly shorter than group 1 patients (p < 0.001). The time to healing was similar in the two groups. The overall success rates for groups 1 and 2 were 92.3% (12 of 13) and 100% (13 of 13), respectively, and there were no statistically significant differences regarding radiological healing. This pilot study suggests that endoscopic curettage and percutaneous grafting is a simple and safe form of treatment, with similar results to those following open treatment.

• Authors: C Yildirim, I Akmaz, O Sahin, K Keklikci
• Journal: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume (J Bone Joint Surg Br) Vol. 93 Issue 12 Pg. 1626-31 (Dec 2011) ISSN: 2044-5377 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 22161925 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)

Topics

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Bone Cysts (surgery)
• Bone Transplantation
• Calcaneus (surgery)
• Curettage
• Endoscopy
• Humans
• Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (methods)
• Orthopedic Procedures (methods)
• Pilot Projects
• Registries (statistics & numerical data)
• Treatment Outcome
• Young Adult