HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Valganciclovir prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy in cytomegalovirus-positive renal allograft recipients: 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention can be achieved by prophylaxis or preemptive therapy. We performed a prospective randomized trial to determine whether renal transplant recipients with a positive CMV serostatus (R+) had a higher rate of CMV infection and disease after transplantation when treated preemptively for CMV infection, compared with primary valganciclovir prophylaxis.
METHODS:
Prophylaxis was 2 × 450 mg oral valganciclovir/day for 100 days; preemptive patients were monitored by CMV-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and after a positive PCR test received 2 × 900 mg valganciclovir/day for at least 14 days followed by secondary prophylaxis. Valganciclovir dosage was adjusted according to renal function. Patients are followed up for 5 years and initial 12-month data are presented. Two hundred and ninety-six recipients were analyzed (168 donor/recipient seropositive [D+/R+], 128 donor seronegative/recipient seropositive [D-/R+]; 146 receiving prophylaxis and 150 preemptive therapy).
RESULTS:
Overall, CMV infection (asymptomatic CMV viral load ≥ 400 CMV DNA copies/mL proven by CMV-PCR) was significantly higher in recipients under preemptive therapy (38.7% vs. 11.0%, P<0.0001), with the highest incidence in D+/R+ preemptive patients (53.8% vs. 15.6%, P<0.0001). D+/R+ recipients with preemptive therapy also had the highest rate of CMV disease (CMV syndrome and tissue-invasive disease that was clinically diagnosed and biopsy proven) (19.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.003). Renal function assessed by creatinine clearance was similar for both groups. Graft loss occurred in 7 vs. 4 patients on preemptive versus prophylactic therapy (P>0.05). Tolerability was similar for both treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Oral valganciclovir prophylaxis significantly reduces CMV infection and disease, particularly for D+/R+ patients. Hence, our study supports routine prophylaxis for all D+/R+ recipients.
AuthorsOliver Witzke, Ingeborg A Hauser, Michael Bartels, Gunter Wolf, Heiner Wolters, Martin Nitschke, VIPP Study Group
JournalTransplantation (Transplantation) Vol. 93 Issue 1 Pg. 61-8 (Jan 15 2012) ISSN: 1534-6080 [Electronic] United States
PMID22094954 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antiviral Agents
  • Valganciclovir
  • Ganciclovir
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antiviral Agents (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Austria
  • Cytomegalovirus Infections (drug therapy, epidemiology, prevention & control)
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Ganciclovir (administration & dosage, adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Germany
  • Graft Rejection (physiopathology)
  • Graft Survival (physiology)
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Kidney Transplantation (physiology)
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Transplantation
  • Transplantation, Homologous
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Valganciclovir

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: