Prophylactic antibiotics for simple hand lacerations: time for a clinical trial?

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Simple hand lacerations (not involving bones, tendons, nerves, or vessels) are a common emergency department (ED) complaint. Whilst the practices of irrigation, debridement, foreign body removal, and suture repair are well accepted, the use of prophylactic antibiotics is not. Without evidenced-based guidelines, practice is left to physician preference.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to assess the need for, and the feasibility to perform, a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the role of prophylactic antibiotics in simple hand lacerations.

METHODS:

The study was done in three phases: (1) estimation of the national ED burden of simple hand lacerations and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis; (2) assessment of indications for antibiotic prophylaxis and (3) investigation of patient willingness to enrol in a randomised controlled trial and their preferred outcomes from simple hand lacerations. For Phase 1, we analysed the 2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. For Phase 2, we surveyed ED physicians in three urban teaching institutions (two in Brooklyn, NY and one in Washington, DC). For Phase 3, we surveyed ED patients at the same three institutions.

RESULTS:

Phase 1: out of 116.8 million ED visits nationally in 2007, 1.8 million (1.6%) were due to simple hand lacerations, of which 1.3 million (71%) required repair. Of those repaired, 27% (95% CI, 19-35%) were prescribed prophylactic antibiotics, most commonly cephalexin (73%). Phase 2: out of 108 providers surveyed, 69 (64%) responded. 16% (95% CI, 9-27%) reported prescribing prophylactic antibiotics routinely, most commonly cephalexin (84%, 95% CI, 67-93%). The degree of contamination was the most important factor (91%, 95% CI, 82-96%) in the physicians' decision to prescribe antibiotics. Phase 3: of the 490 patients surveyed, 64% (95% CI, 60-68%) expressed interest in participating in a study to evaluate the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Their primary concern was prevention of infection (77%, 95% CI, 73-81%).

CONCLUSION:

Simple hand lacerations represent a substantial number of ED visits in the United States. Absence of clear guidelines, disparity in physician practice, and patient interest in infection prevention all support performing a prospective randomised controlled trial to establish the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in simple hand lacerations.

• Authors: Shahriar Zehtabchi, Kabir Yadav, Elizabeth Brothers, Feras Khan, Savitri Singh, R Daniel Wilcoxson, Shweta Malhotra
• Journal: Injury (Injury) Vol. 43 Issue 9 Pg. 1497-501 (Sep 2012) ISSN: 1879-0267 [Electronic] Netherlands
• PMID: 21601852 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Multicenter Study)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Chemical References

• Anti-Bacterial Agents
• Cephalexin

Topics

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Anti-Bacterial Agents (therapeutic use)
• Antibiotic Prophylaxis
• Cephalexin (therapeutic use)
• Child
• District of Columbia (epidemiology)
• Emergency Service, Hospital (statistics & numerical data)
• Female
• Hand Injuries (complications, epidemiology)
• Health Care Surveys
• Hospitals, Urban (statistics & numerical data)
• Humans
• Incidence
• Lacerations (complications, epidemiology)
• Male
• Middle Aged
• New York (epidemiology)
• Practice Patterns, Physicians' (statistics & numerical data)
• Surveys and Questionnaires
• Wound Healing
• Wound Infection (drug therapy, epidemiology, etiology, prevention & control)
• Young Adult