HOMEPRODUCTSSERVICESCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaMobileSign Up FREE or Login

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of asenapine for the prevention of relapse of schizophrenia after long-term treatment.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
Long-term efficacy of asenapine in preventing schizophrenia relapse was assessed in a 26-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that followed 26 weeks of open-label treatment.
METHOD:
Stable schizophrenia patients (DSM-IV-TR criteria) who were cross-titrated from previous medication to sublingual asenapine and remained stable during 26 weeks of open-label treatment were eligible for 26 weeks of double-blind treatment, with randomization to continued asenapine or switch to placebo. Time to relapse/impending relapse (primary endpoint, as usually determined by specific scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness Scale) and discontinuation for any reason (key secondary endpoint) were assessed by survival analyses for asenapine versus placebo. The study was conducted from May 2005 through June 2008.
RESULTS:
Of 700 enrolled patients treated with open-label asenapine, 386 entered (asenapine, n = 194; placebo, n = 192) and 207 completed (n = 135; n = 72) the double-blind phase. Times to relapse/impending relapse and discontinuation for any reason were significantly longer with asenapine than with placebo (both P < .0001). Incidence of relapse/impending relapse was lower with asenapine than placebo (12.1% vs 47.4%, P < .0001). The modal dosage of asenapine was 10 mg twice daily in both phases. During the double-blind phase, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) considered serious with asenapine and placebo was 3.1% and 9.9%, respectively; incidence of extrapyramidal symptom-related AEs was 3.1% and 4.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported AEs with asenapine versus placebo were anxiety (8.2%; 10.9%), increased weight (6.7%; 3.6%), and insomnia (6.2%; 13.5%). The incidence of clinically significant weight gain (≥ 7% increase from double-blind baseline) was 3.7% with asenapine and 0.5% with placebo.
CONCLUSIONS:
Long-term treatment with asenapine was more effective than placebo in preventing relapse of schizophrenia and appeared to be safe and well tolerated.
TRIAL REGISTRATION:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00150176.
AuthorsJohn M Kane, Mary Mackle, Linda Snow-Adami, Jun Zhao, Armin Szegedi, John Panagides
JournalThe Journal of clinical psychiatry (J Clin Psychiatry) Vol. 72 Issue 3 Pg. 349-55 (Mar 2011) ISSN: 1555-2101 [Electronic] United States
PMID21367356 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Copyright© Copyright 2011 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.
Chemical References
  • Antipsychotic Agents
  • Heterocyclic Compounds with 4 or More Rings
  • Asenapine
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antipsychotic Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Anxiety (chemically induced)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Heterocyclic Compounds with 4 or More Rings (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
  • Schizophrenia (drug therapy, prevention & control)
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders (chemically induced)
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Weight Gain (drug effects)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research network!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password: