Abstract | OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on how implant surface characteristics influence peri-implant disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A search of PubMed and The Cochrane Library of the Cochrane Collaboration (CENTRAL) as well as a hand search of articles were conducted. Publications and articles accepted for publication up to March 2010 were included. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were selected for the review. Human studies: To date, few studies have investigated if such differences occur. Limited data suggest that smooth surfaces may be less affected by peri-implantitis than rough surface implants. Animal studies: In ligature-induced peri-implantitis studies, no difference between surfaces has been reported. In a spontaneous progression model of peri-implantitis, there was a suggestion that the progression was more pronounced at implants with a porous anodized surface. CONCLUSION: The current review revealed that only a few studies provided data on how implant surfaces influence peri-implant disease. Based on the limited data available, there is no evidence that implant surface characteristics can have a significant effect on the initiation of peri-implantitis.
|
Authors | Stefan Renvert, Ioannis Polyzois, Noel Claffey |
Journal | Journal of clinical periodontology
(J Clin Periodontol)
Vol. 38 Suppl 11
Pg. 214-22
(Mar 2011)
ISSN: 1600-051X [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 21323717
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review)
|
Copyright | © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. |
Chemical References |
- Dental Implants
- Dental Materials
|
Topics |
- Animals
- Dental Implants
- Dental Materials
(chemistry)
- Dental Prosthesis Design
- Disease Progression
- Humans
- Periodontal Diseases
(etiology)
- Surface Properties
|