a total of 146 treatment-naive patients with
HBeAg-positive
chronic hepatitis B received
clevudine,
entecavir or
lamivudine. C group (n=39) received 30 mg of
clevudine, E group (n=39) received 0.5 mg of
entecavir and L group (n=68) received 100 mg of
lamivudine once a day for more than 48 weeks. The efficacy analysis estimated the mean changes of the HBV
DNA levels as a virologic response, the normalization of the ALT levels (less than 35 IU/L) as a biochemical response and loss of
HBeAg or seroconversion as a serologic response. The serum HBV
DNA level was quantified by hybrid capture and real-time PCR assay.
RESULTS: before the administration of
clevudine,
entecavir and
lamivudine, the mean HBV
DNA and ALT levels and the gender and age were well balanced among the three groups (p>0.05). For the virologic response at 48 weeks, the mean changes of the HBV
DNA levels from baseline of the C, E and L groups were -3.8+/-2.2, -4.5+/-1.9 and -2.5+/-2.1 log copies/mL. C and E group showed superior
antiviral activity compared to that of L group (p<0.0001), but no significant differences in
antiviral response were noted between C and E groups. For the biochemical response at 48 weeks, the normalization of the ALT levels (less than 35 IU/L) among the C, E and L groups was 82%, 74% and 71%, respectively (p=0.46). The rates of undetectable serum HBV
DNA (less than 300 copies/mL) of the C, E and L groups were 39%, 69% and 27%, respectively (p<0.0001). For the serologic response at 48 weeks, the loss of
HBeAg was 13%, 31% and 24% and the seroconversion was 10%, 23% and 17%, respectively. There was no difference of efficacy among the three groups regarding ALT normalization or serologic response (p>0.05). Viral breakthrough in C group was noted at 24 weeks (5%) and 48 weeks (21%), but no biochemical breakthrough was noted. The elevation of the serum CK level was noted in only 1 patient of group C at 48 weeks (2.56%) after
therapy. For the patients without or with
liver cirrhosis (LC), C and E group showed superior
antiviral activity compared to that of the L group, but the
antiviral activity was more effective in non- LC group than LC group (p<0.0001 vs p=0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: