Abstract | BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVE: METHODS AND MATERIALS: Randomized, controlled, single-center, evaluator-blinded trial of 10 patients with at least four clinically diagnosed lesions. RESULTS: All 10 patients completed the study. Mean lesion clearance was 96% for curettage, 92.5% for electrodesiccation, and 88% for laser. There was no significant difference between the three treatment modalities. All three techniques had an overall cosmetic outcome of good for most patients. Five of the 10 patients preferred electrodesiccation. Patients rated the laser as the most painful treatment method. The most common adverse outcome was hyperpigmentation. There were no significant differences between the treatment groups for any of the measured outcomes. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of PDL in the treatment of DPN is not significantly different from the already established treatment modalities of electrodesiccation and curettage. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.
|
Authors | Miki S Garcia, Rahman Azari, Daniel B Eisen |
Journal | Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]
(Dermatol Surg)
Vol. 36
Issue 12
Pg. 1968-72
(Dec 2010)
ISSN: 1524-4725 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 21040130
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Copyright | © 2010 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc. |
Topics |
- Adult
- Curettage
- Electrocoagulation
(methods)
- Facial Dermatoses
(therapy)
- Female
- Humans
- Hyperpigmentation
(therapy)
- Lasers, Dye
- Low-Level Light Therapy
(methods)
- Middle Aged
- Pilot Projects
- Prospective Studies
- Treatment Outcome
|