Anatomic and technical predictors of stent malposition during implantation for vascular obstruction in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

We evaluated the anatomic and technical factors predicting stent malposition and embolization in patients undergoing endovascular stent implantation for relief of noncoronary vascular obstruction.

BACKGROUND:

Endovascular stent implantation provides a highly effective, minimally invasive solution to vascular obstruction in patients with structural heart disease. However, stent implantation is technically challenging and stent embolization occurs in up to 5.5% of cases.

METHODS:

We reviewed patient and procedural characteristics of all endovascular stent implantations performed for relieving noncoronary vascular obstruction from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2009. Univariate and multivariate predictors of stent malposition or embolization were explored through logistic regression methods.

RESULTS:

During the 10-year study period, 429 stents were implanted. Of these, 399 were placed for relief of vascular obstruction in 267 patients during 322 procedures. Initial implantation failure occurred in 33 patients (8.3%), including stent malposition in 18 (4.5%) and stent embolization in 15 (3.8%). Patient size and vascular obstruction caused by external compression or a vascular fold were independent predictors of stent malposition or embolization. All malpositioned and embolized stents were successfully managed without surgery, and none resulted in death, sustained hemodynamic instability, or important vascular injury.

CONCLUSIONS:

Endovascular stent implantation is a highly effective and safe means of relieving noncoronary vascular obstruction in patients with congenital and acquired structural heart disease. Stent embolization occurs in approximately 3.8% of implantation procedures but can be managed successfully without surgical intervention. Anatomic and technical factors predict stent malposition, and consideration of these factors may improve procedural results.

• Authors: Jeffery Meadows, David Teitel, Phillip Moore
• Journal: JACC. Cardiovascular interventions (JACC Cardiovasc Interv) Vol. 3 Issue 10 Pg. 1080-6 (Oct 2010) ISSN: 1876-7605 [Electronic] United States
• PMID: 20965468 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
• Copyright: Copyright © 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Topics

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Angioplasty, Balloon (adverse effects, instrumentation)
• Arterial Occlusive Diseases (complications, diagnostic imaging, therapy)
• Child
• Child, Preschool
• Constriction, Pathologic
• Foreign-Body Migration (etiology, therapy)
• Heart Defects, Congenital (complications)
• Heart Diseases (complications)
• Humans
• Infant
• Infant, Newborn
• Logistic Models
• Middle Aged
• Odds Ratio
• Radiography
• Retrospective Studies
• Risk Assessment
• Risk Factors
• San Francisco
• Stents
• Time Factors
• Treatment Outcome
• Young Adult