HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Potential economic impact of increasing low dose aspirin usage on CVD in the US.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of death in the US and Western Europe, but regular use of preventive low-dose aspirin has proven effective in preventing CVD events. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential economic impact in the US if preventive aspirin usage were to be increased in line with clinical guidelines for primary and secondary prevention.
METHODS:
The risk profile of the US population was characterized using NHANES data, and Framingham cardiovascular risk equations were applied to calculate risk for myocardial infarction, angina and ischemic stroke according to age and gender. Primary and secondary patients were considered separately. Using publicly available unit costs, a budget impact model calculated the annual impact of increased preventive aspirin usage considering gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke adverse events and diminishing aspirin adherence over a 10-year time horizon.
RESULTS:
In a base population of 1,000,000 patients, full implementation of clinical guidelines would potentially prevent an additional 1273 myocardial infarctions, 2184 angina episodes and 565 ischemic strokes in primary prevention patients and an additional 578 myocardial infarctions, and 607 ischemic strokes in secondary prevention patients. This represents a total savings of $79.6 million for primary prevention and $32.2 million for secondary and additional out-of-pocket expense to patients of $29.0 million for primary prevention and $2.6 million for secondary prevention for the cost of aspirin.
CONCLUSIONS:
This budgetary model suggests that there is a strong economic case, both for payers and society, to encourage aspirin use for patients at appropriate risk and per clinical guidelines. It also provides an example of how minimizing costs do not necessarily have to imply a rationing of care. Limitations include the exclusion of other CVD interventions in the analysis.
AuthorsStephanie C Manson, Agnes Benedict, Feng Pan, Kim U Wittrup-Jensen, A Mark Fendrick
JournalCurrent medical research and opinion (Curr Med Res Opin) Vol. 26 Issue 10 Pg. 2365-73 (Oct 2010) ISSN: 1473-4877 [Electronic] England
PMID20738228 (Publication Type: Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Aspirin
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Aspirin (administration & dosage, adverse effects, economics)
  • Cardiovascular Diseases (economics, epidemiology, prevention & control)
  • Chemoprevention (economics, statistics & numerical data)
  • Cost Savings (statistics & numerical data)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Female
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (chemically induced, economics, epidemiology)
  • Guidelines as Topic
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Economic
  • Patient Compliance (statistics & numerical data)
  • Primary Prevention (economics)
  • United States (epidemiology)
  • Young Adult

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: