Moxibustion for ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly used for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Acupuncture-type treatments are among the most popular options. Several studies have reported that moxibustion is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). The objective of this review was to assess the clinical evidence for or against moxibustion as a treatment for UC.

METHODS:

We searched the literature using 18 databases from their inception to February 10, 2010, without language restrictions. We included randomized clinical trials (RCTs), in which human patients with UC were treated with moxibustion. Studies were included if they were placebo-controlled or controlled against a drug therapy or no treatment group. The methodological quality of all RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias.

RESULTS:

In total, five RCTs were included. All were of low methodological quality. They compared the effects of moxibustion with conventional drug therapy. Three tested moxibustion against sulfasalazine and two against sulfasalazine plus other drugs. A meta-analysis of five RCTs showed favorable effects of moxibustion on the response rate compared to conventional drug therapy (n = 407; risk ratio = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.38; P < 0.0001; heterogeneity: I2 = 16%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Current evidence is insufficient to show that moxibustion is an effective treatment of UC. Most of included trials had high risk of bias. More rigorous studies seem warranted.

• Authors: Dong-Hyo Lee, Jong-In Kim, Myeong Soo Lee, Tae-Young Choi, Sun-Mi Choi, Edzard Ernst
• Journal: BMC gastroenterology (BMC Gastroenterol) Vol. 10 Pg. 36 (Apr 07 2010) ISSN: 1471-230X [Electronic] England
• PMID: 20374658 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review, Systematic Review)

Topics

• Colitis, Ulcerative (therapy)
• Humans
• Moxibustion (methods)
• Treatment Outcome