Abstract | BACKGROUND: This investigation was designed to compare a new methodology of automated regular bolus with a continuous infusion of local anesthetic for continuous popliteal sciatic block; both regimens were combined with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). METHODS: RESULTS: Both dosing regimens provided similar postoperative analgesia. Consumption of local anesthetic (5.14 ml/h, 5-5.75 ml/h) and dose request from the PCA (1, 0-5.4) was lower in the automated bolus group as compared to the continuous infusion group (5.9 ml/h, 5.05-7.8 ml/h; doses by PCA: 6.5, 0-20.5; P < 0.05). The need for rescue tramadol was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In continuous popliteal sciatic block, local anesthetic administered as an automated regular bolus in conjunction with PCA provided similar pain relief as a continuous infusion technique combined with PCA; however, the new dosing regimen reduced the need for additional PCA and the overall consumption of local anesthetic.
|
Authors | Manuel Taboada, Jaime Rodríguez, Maria Bermudez, Marcos Amor, Beatriz Ulloa, Francisco Aneiros, Sergi Sebate, Joaquin Cortés, Julian Alvarez, Peter G Atanassoff |
Journal | Anesthesiology
(Anesthesiology)
Vol. 110
Issue 1
Pg. 150-4
(Jan 2009)
ISSN: 1528-1175 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 19104182
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Analgesia, Patient-Controlled
(instrumentation, methods)
- Anesthetics, Local
(administration & dosage)
- Catheters, Indwelling
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Humans
- Infusion Pumps
- Infusions, Intravenous
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Pain Measurement
(drug effects, instrumentation, methods)
- Pain, Postoperative
(physiopathology, prevention & control)
- Peroneal Nerve
(drug effects, physiology)
- Prospective Studies
- Sciatic Nerve
(drug effects, physiology)
|