HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Genital ulcerative disease and sexually transmitted urethritis and circumcision: a meta-analysis.

Abstract
The objective of the study was to determine the relationship of circumcision status to the risk for genital ulcerative disease (GUD) and sexually transmitted urethritis. A MEDLINE search and a review of references in published articles identified studies addressing the risk of sexually transmitted urethritis or GUD based on circumcision status. Meta-analyses, sensitivity analysis, and exploration for publication bias were performed. Thirty articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The data from one study were published twice. GUD showed a trend towards being more common in genitally intact men (random-effects summary odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98-1.82). When comparing men with GUD to men with 'genital discharge syndrome' (GDS), genitally intact men were more likely to have GUD (OR = 2.31, 95% CI = 1.70-3.15). There was no difference in the risk for chancroid based on circumcision status (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.40-2.05), gonorrhoea (OR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.82-1.29), or Chlamydia trachomatis infections (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.32-1.19). Genitally intact men were less likely to be diagnosed with 'GDS' (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.67-1.01) or non-specific urethritis (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.64-1.01). Adjustment for publication bias in the literature that applies to chlamydial infections gave a summary OR of 0.46 (95% CI = 0.22-0.97). Significant between-study heterogeneity was a consistent finding. In conclusion, genitally intact men may be at greater risk for GUD, whereas circumcised men may be at greater risk for acquiring sexually transmitted urethritis in general, but there is no statistically significant difference in risk of gonococcal infection. Significant between-study heterogeneity and evidence of publication bias exclude the possibility of reaching a definitive conclusion regarding the association of circumcision status and these sexually transmitted infections.
AuthorsRobert S Van Howe
JournalInternational journal of STD & AIDS (Int J STD AIDS) Vol. 18 Issue 12 Pg. 799-809 (Dec 2007) ISSN: 0956-4624 [Print] England
PMID18073009 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review)
Topics
  • Circumcision, Male (adverse effects)
  • Genital Diseases, Male (epidemiology)
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (epidemiology)
  • Ulcer (epidemiology)
  • Urethritis (epidemiology)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: