HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

An open-label comparative pilot study of oral voriconazole and itraconazole for long-term treatment of paracoccidioidomycosis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
In previous studies, itraconazole was revealed to be an effective therapy and was considered to be the gold standard treatment for mild-to-moderate acute and chronic clinical forms of paracoccidioidomycosis. A pilot study was conducted to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of voriconazole for the long-term treatment of acute or chronic paracoccidioidomycosis, with itraconazole as the control treatment.
METHODS:
A randomized, open-label study was conducted at 3 Brazilian tertiary care hospitals. Patients were randomized (at a 2 : 1 ratio) to receive oral therapy with voriconazole or itraconazole for 6 months. Patients receiving >or=1 dose of study drug were evaluated for safety; patients with confirmed paracoccidioidomycosis who completed >or=6 months of therapy (treatment-evaluable patients) were evaluated for treatment efficacy. Satisfactory global response was assessed at the end of treatment.
RESULTS:
Fifty-three patients were evaluated for treatment safety (35 received voriconazole, and 18 received itraconazole). Both drugs were well tolerated. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the voriconazole group included abnormal vision, chromatopsia, rash, and headache; the most common treatment-related adverse events in the itraconazole group included bradycardia, diarrhea, and headache. Liver function test values were slightly higher in patients receiving voriconazole than in those receiving itraconazole; 2 patients in the voriconazole group were withdrawn from treatment because of increased liver function test values. In the intent-to-treat populations, the satisfactory response rate (i.e., complete or partial global response) was 88.6% among the voriconazole group and 94.4% among the itraconazole group. The response rate among treatment-evaluable patients was 100% for both treatment groups; no relapses were observed after 8 weeks of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS:
This is, to our knowledge, the first study to demonstrate that voriconazole is as well tolerated and effective as itraconazole for the long-term treatment of paracoccidioidomycosis.
AuthorsFlavio Queiroz-Telles, Luciano Z Goldani, Haran T Schlamm, James M Goodrich, Ana Espinel-Ingroff, Maria A Shikanai-Yasuda
JournalClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (Clin Infect Dis) Vol. 45 Issue 11 Pg. 1462-9 (Dec 01 2007) ISSN: 1537-6591 [Electronic] United States
PMID17990229 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Antifungal Agents
  • Pyrimidines
  • Triazoles
  • Itraconazole
  • Voriconazole
Topics
  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antifungal Agents (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Itraconazole (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Paracoccidioidomycosis (drug therapy)
  • Pilot Projects
  • Pyrimidines (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Triazoles (administration & dosage, therapeutic use)
  • Voriconazole

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: