Abstract | BACKGROUND: Prostatic stents offer a third clinical option for patients with bladder-outlet obstruction who are unfit for surgical relief and wish to avoid long-term catheterization. We report our experience with the Abbey-Moor Spanner temporary prostatic stent in patients with acute and chronic symptoms of bladder-outlet obstruction secondary to benign or malignant disease who were unfit for surgery because of age or cardiorespiratory disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of 43 consecutive patients stented March 2004 through November 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Stents were removed and replaced every 3 months if tolerated. RESULTS: More than half of the patients (63%) had an unsatisfactory outcome, namely, immediate or delayed retention or elective removal because of unbearable symptoms. The remaining 37% of patients had a satisfactory outcome and either continue to have the stent in situ after a mean of five changes or are stent free after a successful voiding trial. CONCLUSION: Only 21% of the patients in whom stenting was indicated continued to have a stent in situ at the end of the study. We suggest that in such patients, a temporary stent such as the AbbeyMoor Spanner should be used for only 3 months as a trial of stenting followed by a trial of stent-free voiding, with the patient converted to permanent prostatic stenting if voiding is unsuccessful.
|
Authors | Samuel J S Grimsley, M H Khan, Elspeth Lennox, Peter H Paterson |
Journal | Journal of endourology
(J Endourol)
Vol. 21
Issue 9
Pg. 1093-6
(Sep 2007)
ISSN: 0892-7790 [Print] United States |
PMID | 17941793
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Equipment Design
- Equipment Failure
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Models, Anatomic
- Patient Satisfaction
- Prostate
(pathology, physiopathology)
- Prostatic Hyperplasia
(complications, therapy)
- Prostatic Neoplasms
(complications, therapy)
- Retrospective Studies
- Stents
- Treatment Outcome
- Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
(therapy)
|