HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis. A meta-analysis of results.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The aim of this review was to evaluate surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gangrenous and empyematous acute cholecystitis defined as severe acute cholecystitis.
BACKGROUND:
It is not known to what extent surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe acute cholecystitis differ from those for the nonsevere acute form, making it questionable whether urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best approach even in severe acute cases.
METHODS:
Literature searches were conducted to identify: (1) comparative studies which reported laparoscopic surgical outcomes separately for severe acute and nonsevere acute cholecystitis; (2) studies comparing such an approach with open cholecystectomy, subtotal laparoscopic cholecystectomy or cholecystostomy in severe acute cholecystitis. Results were pooled by standard meta-analytic techniques.
RESULTS:
Seven studies with a total of 1,408 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were found. The risks of conversion (RR 3.2, 95% CI 2.5 to 4.2) and overall postoperative complications (RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2) were significantly higher in severe acute cholecystitis with respect to the nonsevere acute forms. However, no difference was detected as regards to local postoperative complications. No studies comparing open cholecystectomy or cholecystostomy with urgent laparoscopy were found.
CONCLUSION:
A lower feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been found for severe cholecystitis. A lower threshold of conversion is recommended since this may allow to reduce local postoperative complications. Literature data lack valuable comparative studies with other treatment modalities, which therefore need to be investigated.
AuthorsGiuseppe Borzellino, Stefan Sauerland, Anna Maria Minicozzi, Giuseppe Verlato, Carlo Di Pietrantonj, Giovanni de Manzoni, Claudio Cordiano
JournalSurgical endoscopy (Surg Endosc) Vol. 22 Issue 1 Pg. 8-15 (Jan 2008) ISSN: 1432-2218 [Electronic] Germany
PMID17704863 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Review)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Age Distribution
  • Cholangiography
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic (adverse effects, methods)
  • Cholecystitis, Acute (diagnostic imaging, epidemiology, surgery)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Italy (epidemiology)
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures (adverse effects, methods)
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain, Postoperative (physiopathology)
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Sex Distribution
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: