Electrocoagulation bronchoscopy biopsy
forceps may prevent
bleeding, but could also impair the quality of the specimens obtained. Patients with endobronchial lesions during bronchoscopy underwent six endobronchial biopsies each with a hot biopsy
forceps, alternating between with
electrocoagulation ("hot") and without ("cold").
Bleeding was quantified on a scale of 1-4, with 1 being no
bleeding. The generator was set on "soft coagulation" mode, with power settings of 40, 60, 80 and 100 W for each group of 10 patients in a sequential fashion. Clinical pathology results were recorded before samples were reviewed by a second, blinded, pulmonary pathologist. A total of 39 patients with 40 endobronchial lesions had six biopsies performed (one patient had only four samples taken), giving a total of 238 biopsy samples. Concordance between hot and cold samples was 92.5% for the clinical pathologist and 87% for the blinded pathologist. Paired analysis suggested lower average
bleeding score with the use of hot
forceps. Overall
bleeding rates for cold and hot biopsies, respectively, were as follows: grade 1: 30.3 and 41.2%; grade 2: 62.2 and 49.6%; grade 3: 7.6 and 9.2%; and grade 4: 0 and 0%. In conclusion, the use of hot biopsy
forceps for endobronchial biopsy does not appear to have a negative impact on the pathological samples. Hot biopsy
forceps showed a statistically significant reduction in
bleeding score, which is unlikely to be of clinical significance.