Abstract | PURPOSE: MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective study we reviewed the files of 63 children treated with a daytime alarm because of persistent daytime wetting. Results were considered a complete success when the children were completely dry after treatment, a partial success when there was greater than 50% improvement in daytime wetting and a failure when no change was observed in daytime symptoms. RESULTS: During a study period of 25 months 63 children were treated with a daytime alarm at the department of pediatric urology. The mean treatment period was 14 days. At a followup of 12 months treatment failed in 20 children (32%), 21 (33%) had partial success and 22 (35%) were successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS: In children with therapy resistant daytime wetting and an overactive detrusor the daytime alarm may be a useful treatment tool. Complete cure of daytime incontinence can be attained in 35% of patients, almost a third have improvement in their complaints and training fails in a third.
|
Authors | E Van Laecke, S Wille, J Vande Walle, A Raes, C Renson, F Peeren, P Hoebeke |
Journal | The Journal of urology
(J Urol)
Vol. 176
Issue 1
Pg. 325-7
(Jul 2006)
ISSN: 0022-5347 [Print] United States |
PMID | 16753433
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Behavior Therapy
(instrumentation, methods)
- Child
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Urinary Incontinence
(therapy)
|